2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-GHBP: Improving prediction of Growth Hormone-binding proteins using deep learning model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 10-fold CV was widely used for solving biological problems like phage virion proteins classification, lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation identification, identification of cancer-lectins and extracellular matrix proteins, , and detection of membrane protein types. , The binary classification was performed using a confusion matrix (CM). Afterward, five performance evaluation parameters are used: accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), Mathew’s correlation coefficient (MCC), and F-measure. , These parameters are calculated as follows: Acc = TP + TN TP + FP + TN + FN Sn = TP TP + FN Sp nobreak0em.25em⁡ = TN FP + TN MCC = false( TN × TP false) false( FN × FP ) false( TP + FN false) false( TP + FP false) false( TN + FN false) false( TN + FP false) F‐measure = 2 × Precision × Recall Precision + Recall in which Precision = TP TP + FP …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 10-fold CV was widely used for solving biological problems like phage virion proteins classification, lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation identification, identification of cancer-lectins and extracellular matrix proteins, , and detection of membrane protein types. , The binary classification was performed using a confusion matrix (CM). Afterward, five performance evaluation parameters are used: accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), Mathew’s correlation coefficient (MCC), and F-measure. , These parameters are calculated as follows: Acc = TP + TN TP + FP + TN + FN Sn = TP TP + FN Sp nobreak0em.25em⁡ = TN FP + TN MCC = false( TN × TP false) false( FN × FP ) false( TP + FN false) false( TP + FP false) false( TN + FN false) false( TN + FP false) F‐measure = 2 × Precision × Recall Precision + Recall in which Precision = TP TP + FP …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, five performance evaluation parameters are used: accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), Mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC), and F-measure. 60,61 These parameters are calculated as follows: (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) in which ( 20) (21) where TN, TP, FN, and FP are the numbers of true negatives, true positives, false negatives, and false positives, respectively. TP denotes the number of antifreeze proteins.…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e model performance is examined by different validation approaches e commonly used validation methods are k-fold and jackknife [44][45][46][47]. However, the jackknife is time-consuming and costly [48][49][50]. During 10-fold cross validation, training set is split into 10-folds.…”
Section: Proposed Model Validation Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FS cope with overfitting problem and can boost the model performance 40 . FS techniques are categorized into three classes: wrappers, filters, and embedded approaches 41 . Wrapper methods employ the classifiers to select the best features set.…”
Section: Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%