2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep eutectic solvents microbial toxicity: Current state of art and critical evaluation of testing methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Hence, this result seems to support our assumption that DES toxicity testing cannot be limited to the use of only one of the widely recognized methods for testing the antibacterial properties of natural and synthetic chemical compounds. 35 Nevertheless, looking more closely at the data from absorbance measurements collected for each well of the 96-well plate during MIC assay (data not shown), it can be indeed seen that more bacterial cells survived at the MIC value when comparing primary and heated DES samples. Furthermore, from Table 3, it can be observed that the same concentrations of malonic acid individually and DES were needed to inhibit the bacterial growth.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…35 Hence, this result seems to support our assumption that DES toxicity testing cannot be limited to the use of only one of the widely recognized methods for testing the antibacterial properties of natural and synthetic chemical compounds. 35 Nevertheless, looking more closely at the data from absorbance measurements collected for each well of the 96-well plate during MIC assay (data not shown), it can be indeed seen that more bacterial cells survived at the MIC value when comparing primary and heated DES samples. Furthermore, from Table 3, it can be observed that the same concentrations of malonic acid individually and DES were needed to inhibit the bacterial growth.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…They were chosen due their previous use in antimicrobial studies 42 and the fact that many other strains belonging to the E. coli, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa genus were previously used as representative models of Gram-positive and Gram-negative species for assaying antimicrobial activity of many types of DESs and compounds used as HBAs and HBDs in their preparation. 35 Disk Diffusion Test. The toxicity of the compounds after contact with the bacteria was primarily determined using disk diffusion assay.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Area 1, a progressive biocidal response is observed for DES 5, 4, and 2, followed by DES 3 and 1; in Area 2, for DES 4, 2, and 5, followed by DES 3 and 1. This response is in agreement with the literature [ 28 ]. Indeed, DES 2 and 4, consisting of malonic acid and oxalic acid, respectively, have a more acidic pH, therefore creating conditions that limit bacterial growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the toxicity of choline chloride (ChCl)-based DESs in three bacterial strains ( E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus ) were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, and it was concluded that both ChCl:urea and ChCl:glucose seem to have low toxicity, and thus, may be referred to as “green solvents” [ 24 ]. The current studies on the microbial toxicity of DESs showed that they were generally less toxic to different microorganisms and were less toxic than traditional organic solvents; therefore, the use of DESs is encouraged [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%