2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac20f1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep domain adversarial method with central moment discrepancy for intelligent transfer fault diagnosis

Abstract: Big data condition monitoring in the industrial of internet era is indispensable, and intelligent fault diagnosis plays an important role in it. The adversarial learning method is widely used because of its ability to extract domain invariant features to solve the variable speed fault diagnosis problem. However, its training process is often unstable and difficult to converge to the optimal solution, which brings great challenges to the fault detection of equipment. In view of this exasperating problem, a nove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After adjusting the sample weight, the sampling training process using the improved LM algorithm is shown in Figure 3. From Figure 4, when the unimproved neural network is trained 100 times, there is still a big gap from the error of 10 -2 , and the neural network combined by the SOM method and the LM method, convergence is reached after 20 trainings [52][53][54][55][56][57][58] . Using the above combination of SOM method and LM method, the training process is shown in Figures…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adjusting the sample weight, the sampling training process using the improved LM algorithm is shown in Figure 3. From Figure 4, when the unimproved neural network is trained 100 times, there is still a big gap from the error of 10 -2 , and the neural network combined by the SOM method and the LM method, convergence is reached after 20 trainings [52][53][54][55][56][57][58] . Using the above combination of SOM method and LM method, the training process is shown in Figures…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two categories of matching mechanisms can be identified in these works. First is the statistic moment matching based mechanism such as MMD [17] [18], CMD (Central Moment Discrepancy) [19] and second-order statistic matching [20]. Second is the adversarial matching mechanism which enforces sample representations from different domain to be nondiscriminative by minimizing the adversarial loss.…”
Section: B Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wen et al [20] used a sparse autoencoder as the general feature extractor of the TL network, and the DA measurement criteria of the training data and the testing data used maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). In addition to MMD, CORrelation ALignment (CORAL) [21] and central moment discrepancy [22] are mathematical statistics for measuring discrepancy in domain distribution. Another DA method is adversarial learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%