2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icdmw53433.2021.00124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Network Representation Matching with Outliers

Abstract: Research has revealed the effectiveness of network representation techniques in handling diverse downstream machine learning tasks upon graph structured data. However, most network representation methods only seek to learn information in a single network, which fails to learn knowledge across different networks. Moreover, outliers in real-world networks pose great challenges to match distribution shift of learned embeddings. In this paper, we propose a novel joint learning framework, called CrossOSR, to learn … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L encoder = L recon + αL en reg (7) where α is a hyper-parameter. After minimizing the loss L encoder and updating all weights and biases, we can obtain C and define the strength of edge between v i and v j as follows.…”
Section: Link Strength Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…L encoder = L recon + αL en reg (7) where α is a hyper-parameter. After minimizing the loss L encoder and updating all weights and biases, we can obtain C and define the strength of edge between v i and v j as follows.…”
Section: Link Strength Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To learn graph data representation, every relationship in the graph should be converted into a feature space that can be further processed to address the downstream tasks [6,7]. However, by merely learning graph-structured data, the embedding space learned by the model may be historically biased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on fake reviews have grown noticeably in the last 5 years, and Figure 1 presents the research status by showing the number of papers with keyword “fake reviews” on SCI, EI, and DBLP, respectively. The anonymity characteristic of the Internet makes it challenging for the websites to handle fake reviews, and the high volume of freelancers and botnets worsen this situation (Wang et al, 2019 ; Wen et al, 2020 ; Hou et al, 2021 ; Li et al, 2021b ). Moreover, fake reviewers adopt camouflage techniques to hide their identities (Hooi et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%