2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-Cross-Attention Recommendation Model for Knowledge Sharing Micro Learning Service

Abstract: Aims to provide flexible, effective and personalized online learning service, micro learning has gained wide attention in recent years as more people turn to use fragment time to grasp fragmented knowledge. Widely available online knowledge sharing is one of the most representative approaches to micro learning, and it is well accepted by online learners. However, information overload challenges such personalized online learning services. In this paper, we propose a deep cross attention recommendation model to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wisdom service has the characteristics of efficiency, personalization, and diversification, and personalized service is the core of library wisdom service [18]. e personalized wisdom service is user-centered and user-driven, with the characteristics of contextuality, knowledge, initiative, and real-time, reflecting humanistic sentiment and humanistic wisdom.…”
Section: User Profiling and Personalized Smart Services For Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wisdom service has the characteristics of efficiency, personalization, and diversification, and personalized service is the core of library wisdom service [18]. e personalized wisdom service is user-centered and user-driven, with the characteristics of contextuality, knowledge, initiative, and real-time, reflecting humanistic sentiment and humanistic wisdom.…”
Section: User Profiling and Personalized Smart Services For Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that this Systematic Literature Mapping is mainly aimed at researchers moving from the Recommender Systems area to the Technology Enhanced Learning area, in particular, for formal learning. Therefore, the review does not include works that do not focus on formal learning or papers published in the Artificial Intelligence in Education area, although systems such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems have similar goals and might even implement similar algorithms [Manouselis et al, 2011, Paiva et al,2014, Penteado et al,2018, Bel Hadj Ammar et al, 2020, Fotoporlou et al, 2020, Lin et al, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n represents the number of samples, m is the number of categories, yij represents 1 when the i-th sample belongs to the category j, otherwise it is 0, and pij represents the probability that the i-th sample is classified as the j-th category [47]. When it is binary classification, the formula is simplified to: B = − ∑ * log A + *1 − + log*1 − A ++ (13) yi is the true category of the i-th input sample xi, and pi is the probability of predicting that xi is a positive sample [48]. The smaller the Logistic Loss, the better, and when it is 0, it is a perfect classifier.…”
Section: B Description Of Evaluation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, FM only involves second-order feature interaction, which is a shallow model, but in real life data is often highly nonlinear, as is the case with recommendation systems. High-order feature interaction is essential for good performance [13]. Although theoretically FM can fit high-order feature combinations, such calculations are too large, and time complexity and storage space consumption will explode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%