Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2166966.2167044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deducing parameters for personalizing maps from map interaction patterns

Abstract: Interactive maps on the internet have become frequently used means to convey spatial information to the public. However, many maps are not developed to suit a variety of users and thus lead to frustration. To user-center maps we therefore recommend to personalize them to individual users. As many parameters that can be used as a trigger for personalization are not easy to be logged on the internet, we suggest user-map interaction. Interaction can be easily tracked and gives comprehensive information about map … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a map-use context, the lighting environment has also drawn the attention of many cartographers. Raubal and Panov (2009) and Weninger (2012) recommended changing the map symbols to match the time of day or the season.…”
Section: Dark Maps and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a map-use context, the lighting environment has also drawn the attention of many cartographers. Raubal and Panov (2009) and Weninger (2012) recommended changing the map symbols to match the time of day or the season.…”
Section: Dark Maps and Usabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a map‐use context, the lighting environment has also drawn the attention of many cartographers. Raubal and Panov (2009) and Weninger (2012) recommended changing the map symbols to match the time of day or the season. To address visibility limitations based on the lighting environment, interfaces should respond differently in dim and bright lighting environments (Schilling et al, 2005; Zhang et al, 2009), such as by adjusting the color of the map symbols and size of the labels (Sarjakoski & Nivala, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Atzmanstorfer et al ( 2016 ) emphasize the importance of designing maps with reference to local conventions; Gottwald et al ( 2016 ) discuss challenges faced by users with low levels of computer, internet, or map literacy, especially found in older adults; Nivala and Sarjakoski ( 2007 ) examine map designs that represent use situations, e.g. temporal and seasonal changes (summer and winter), and differences in age and nationalities; Weninger ( 2012 ) considers the relevance of examining interaction patterns; and Lokka and Çöltekin ( 2020 ) review the effects on the visual design of adults with different age and cognitive abilities.…”
Section: User Context In Designing Mobile Map Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christophe et al (2016) worked on a service-oriented extension of the SLD/SE specifications to allow for personalized and institutional maps by managing extended map specifications by means of controllable expressive rendering methods. To summarize, user-centric maps are based on user-map interactions, adaptation of content, functions, appearance, technology in use or information demand to individual users (Weninger, 2012). Besides, other ideas exist, what a personalized map means.…”
Section: A Diverse Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%