2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-018-0149-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decrypting the sulfur cycle in oceanic oxygen minimum zones

Abstract: Here we present ecophysiological studies of the anaerobic sulfide oxidizers considered critical to cryptic sulfur cycling in oceanic oxygen minimum zones (OMZs). We find that HS oxidation rates by microorganisms in the Chilean OMZ offshore from Dichato are sufficiently rapid (18 nM h), even at HS concentrations well below 100 nM, to oxidize all sulfide produced during sulfate reduction in OMZs. Even at 100 nM, HS is well below published half-saturation concentrations and we conclude that the sulfide-oxidizing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest specific growth rates measured under anoxic growth conditions were in media with 1 μM sulfide added, whereas sulfide concentrations of >1 μM inhibited growth. Recent evidence of high-affinity sulfide uptake by SUP05 in anoxic marine waters indicates that there is a cryptic marine sulfur cycle operating at below-detection (nanomolar) substrate concentrations (20). Here, we show that sources of reduced sulfur other than sulfide, including organic sulfur, could support a cryptic sulfur cycle in oxygenated seawater with concentrations as low as 10 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest specific growth rates measured under anoxic growth conditions were in media with 1 μM sulfide added, whereas sulfide concentrations of >1 μM inhibited growth. Recent evidence of high-affinity sulfide uptake by SUP05 in anoxic marine waters indicates that there is a cryptic marine sulfur cycle operating at below-detection (nanomolar) substrate concentrations (20). Here, we show that sources of reduced sulfur other than sulfide, including organic sulfur, could support a cryptic sulfur cycle in oxygenated seawater with concentrations as low as 10 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affinity of SUP05 bacteria for sulfide is higher than reported for any other bacterium or substrate (Crowe et al ., 2018 ), demanding a re‐evaluation of the existing definition of euxinia. Currently, the sulfide concentration threshold to distinguish non‐sulfidic from euxinic conditions commonly falls in the range of 0.5–1 μM.…”
Section: Sulfur‐oxidizing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This threshold is similar to the in vitro Michaelis–Menten half‐saturation constant ( K m ) of 2 μM of purified high‐affinity Sqr proteins (Schutz et al ., 1997 ; Brito et al ., 2009 ) and the K m found for phototrophic SOB (> 0.8 μM; Van Gemerden, 1984 ). However, the estimated K m of SUP05 bacteria is much lower (25–340 nM; Crowe et al ., 2018 ). The most widely used method for determining sulfide concentrations has a sulfide detection limit of 0.1 μM (Cline, 1969 ; Jørgensen et al ., 1991 ; Zopfi et al ., 2001 ), hence falling within this estimated range.…”
Section: Sulfur‐oxidizing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of SUP05 to store intracellular sulfur (Callbeck et al 2018; Shah et al 2019), combined with its affinity for low‐sulfide concentrations, could explain how they are able to persist throughout the spring–summer anoxic period in the ETSP region (Léniz et al 2017) (Fig. 2C), and even when dissolved sulfide is absent (Crowe et al 2018).…”
Section: Termination Of Sulfidic Events By a Succession Of Sulfide‐oxidizing Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%