2016
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decrease in oceanic crustal thickness since the breakup of Pangaea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic reflection and petrologic studies of overthickened crust related to the Atlantic Eastern Magmatic Province (Figure ) and the major element chemistry of post‐breakup lavas adjacent to rifted continental fragments (Brandl et al, ; Kelemen & Holbrook, ) are, however, consistent with lateral temperature variations of around 150 °C at the time of Pangea breakup. This result is in accord also with a recent global compilation suggesting that upper mantle temperatures, crustal production, and cooling rates were enhanced in the Atlantic and Indian ocean basins compared to the Pacific at 170 Ma (Van Avendonk et al, ), a picture which is also inferred on the basis of the unusually smooth Jurassic seafloor in the Atlantic (Whittaker et al, ). On the basis of these varied observational data, we take the maximum lateral upper mantle temperature variation during the Pangean epoch to be 150 ° C.…”
Section: Mantle Thermal Isolation‐to‐remixing and Global Volcanic Sousupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seismic reflection and petrologic studies of overthickened crust related to the Atlantic Eastern Magmatic Province (Figure ) and the major element chemistry of post‐breakup lavas adjacent to rifted continental fragments (Brandl et al, ; Kelemen & Holbrook, ) are, however, consistent with lateral temperature variations of around 150 °C at the time of Pangea breakup. This result is in accord also with a recent global compilation suggesting that upper mantle temperatures, crustal production, and cooling rates were enhanced in the Atlantic and Indian ocean basins compared to the Pacific at 170 Ma (Van Avendonk et al, ), a picture which is also inferred on the basis of the unusually smooth Jurassic seafloor in the Atlantic (Whittaker et al, ). On the basis of these varied observational data, we take the maximum lateral upper mantle temperature variation during the Pangean epoch to be 150 ° C.…”
Section: Mantle Thermal Isolation‐to‐remixing and Global Volcanic Sousupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On average, links between mid‐ocean ridge crustal production and sea‐level rise loosely constrain a factor of 1.9 increase in Creataceous volcanic outgassing (see discussions in Berner, and Lenton et al, ). In addition, as we discuss in greater detail in section , enhanced mid‐ocean ridge (MOR) crustal production following Pangean breakup (Brandl et al, ; Kelemen & Holbrook, ; Van Avendonk et al, ; Whittaker et al, ) was complemented by magmatism and CO2 outgassing along an extensive system of collisional continental arcs (Beerling & Royer, ; Lee & Lackey, ; Lee et al, ), as well as temporally clustered LIP volcanism are distinctive features of the Mesozoic (Figure 4). Volcanism and CO2 outgassing from stratovolcanoes related to mantle melting was further amplified by perhaps a factor of 2–3 by additional crustal contributions of accreted carbonate rocks (Lee et al, ).…”
Section: Pangean and Rodinian Proxy Data: Rapid Transitions In Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffraction surfaces are shown as white curves. Black bars indicate reflection points for the DRs on all OBS records basin crust dating from 65 to 85 Ma reported by Van Avendonk et al (2017). Thus, our data provide no evidence for substantial magmatic underplating due to plume activity beneath the northeastern Hawaiian Arch (e.g., Leahy et al 2010).…”
Section: Crustal and Uppermost Mantle Structurementioning
confidence: 71%
“…This has dynamic significance because newly formed oceanic lithosphere is compositionally buoyant with respect to the underlying mantle due to the low density of the crust and lower density of the harzburgite portion of the lithosphere that overlies the undepleted peridotite. This age estimate varies as a function of crustal thickness (thicker crust will require longer cooling), metamorphic phase changes (blueschist and eclogite densify the crust requiring a shorter cooling period), serpentinization of the slab mantle (leading again to longer estimates for cooling), or secular variations in the temperature of the upper mantle, with warmer conditions in the past leading to the formation of thicker and more buoyant crust (van Avendonk et al, 2017;Vlaar et al, 1993). Prior to that, the thermal buoyancy of the warm oceanic lithosphere can aid the exhumation of the OC.…”
Section: Conditions That Lead To Warmer-than-average Subduction Zone mentioning
confidence: 99%