1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1251-8050(97)81163-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Découverte d'une forme ancestrale du Petit Panda dans le Miocène moyen de Madrid (Espagne)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence in Simocyon of the masticatory specializations of Ailurus for herbivory clearly indicates that their common ancestor, which first evolved the false thumb, would have been a generalized carnivore, not a bamboo feeder. The dentition of Amphictis, a possible basal ailurid from the Late Oligocene and Early Miocene of Eurasia (25), is very similar to that of Simocyon, supporting the notion that the modified dentition of Ailurus is a secondary specialization already present in the fossil ailurine Magerictis imperialensis from the Middle Miocene of Spain (17 million years ago) (26), in other more recent forms from France Ϸ12 million years ago (27), and in the more advanced Pristinailurus bristoli from the Late Miocene of North America (28). Thus, the separation between Simocyon and the Ailurus lineage would have occurred very early in the evolution of the family Ailuridae but later than the appearance of the false thumb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The absence in Simocyon of the masticatory specializations of Ailurus for herbivory clearly indicates that their common ancestor, which first evolved the false thumb, would have been a generalized carnivore, not a bamboo feeder. The dentition of Amphictis, a possible basal ailurid from the Late Oligocene and Early Miocene of Eurasia (25), is very similar to that of Simocyon, supporting the notion that the modified dentition of Ailurus is a secondary specialization already present in the fossil ailurine Magerictis imperialensis from the Middle Miocene of Spain (17 million years ago) (26), in other more recent forms from France Ϸ12 million years ago (27), and in the more advanced Pristinailurus bristoli from the Late Miocene of North America (28). Thus, the separation between Simocyon and the Ailurus lineage would have occurred very early in the evolution of the family Ailuridae but later than the appearance of the false thumb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Such perceptions have led to proposed classifications of the red panda as a member of the ursidae, reflected in standard reference books (Wozencraft, 1989a,b, 1993). Both extant species have Asiatic distributions, but whereas the fossil record of the giant panda group is restricted to Eurasia, with early members of the extant genus Ailuropoda (Pei, 1974) as well as the Late Miocene genera Ailurarctos and Agriarctos (Qiu & Qi, 1989), fossils of red panda relatives are known from sites both in Eurasia, including the genera Simocyon , Magerictis and Parailurus (Ginsburg et al. 1997, 2001; Wang, 1997; Sasagawa et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower second molar of Magerictis is slightly larger than the herein presented respective tooth and has a lower m2W/m2L ratio ( Table 17 ; Fig 22 ). Additionally, this tooth differs significantly from SNSB-BSPG-2020 XCIV-5705 in several morphological traits: the outline of the tooth is not oblique, there are no connecting cristae between the metaconid and the protoconid, the metaconid is more mesially positioned, the hypoconid is larger, the paraconid is considerably developed and several additional cuspulids can be seen in the distal part of the talonid [ 167 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%