Decoupling the use and meaning of strategic plans in public healthcare

Abstract

BackgroundThe culture of New Public Management has promoted the diffusion of strategic management tools throughout Public Healthcare Organisations (PHOs). There is consensus that better strategic planning tools are required to achieve higher levels of organisational performance. This paper provides evidence and understanding of the emergent uses and scope of strategic planning in PHOs, in order to answer three research questions: (i) has the New Public Management approach changed the organisational culture of PHOs in terms of how they adopt, diffuse, and use strategic planning documents? (ii) how coherent are strategic planning documents in PHOs? and (iii) what are the main purposes of strategic documents in PHOs?MethodsAn analysis was carried out in three Italian Local Health Authorities. We analysed the number and types of formal strategic documents adopted between 2004 and 2012, evaluating their degree of coherence and coordination, their hierarchy, their degree of disclosure, and the consistency of their strategic goals. A content analysis was performed to investigate overlap in terms of content and focus, and a qualitative analysis was carried out to study and represent the relationships between documents.ResultsThe analysis showed that a rich set of strategic documents were adopted by each PHO. However, these are often uncoordinated and overlap in terms of content. They adopt different language and formats for various stakeholders. The presence of diverse external drivers may explain the divergent focus, priorities and inconsistent goals in the strategic documents. This planning complexity makes it difficult to determine how the overall goals and mission of an organisation are defined and made visible.ConclusionsThe evidence suggests that PHOs use a considerable number of strategic documents. However, they employ no clear or explicit overarching strategy currently, and strategic planning appears to be externally oriented. All the documents communicate similar topics to different stakeholders, although they use different language to answer to the different expectations of each stakeholder. Therefore, strategic planning and plans seem to be driven by neo-institutional approaches, as they are means to build consensus and negotiate ground for strategic actions, rather than means to identify strategic choices and priorities.

Using patient value statements to develop a culture of patient-centred care: a case study of an Ontario, Canada hospital

“…Key to this step was community engagement, which provided an understanding the values of the community served. [44][45][46] Community engagement helped set the direction for the hospital's strategic plan and Guiding Principles, as it ensured the community buy-in and a joint effort in achieving organizational objectives, 47 increased communications with stakeholders, 48 and this in turn helped increase the adoption of the strategic plan and Guiding Principles. 42,49 Once the Guiding Principles were in place, this provided a clear direction for the hospital.…”

An Assessment of Aviation Safety Management System Applications From the New Institutional Theory Perspective

“…The literature provides studies, carried out in various fields, related to the use of decoupling strategies by implementing certain structures solely on paper with concern for legitimacy. The organizations were claimed to have resorted to decoupling strategies in Lega et al (2013) related to the diffusion of strategic management tools in public health organizations, in Tenhiala and Vuori (2012) with regard to the adaptation of compensation practices into human resources management in Finnish organizations, in Beverland and Luxton (2005) related to Integrated Marketing Communication (another management approach) and Powell and Bromley (2012) related to accountability. It is suggested that certain organizations adopt decoupling and symbolic compliance in Westphal and Zajac (2001), a study on the diffusion of Stock Repurchase Programs in the US in 1980 and 1990s, in Jamali ( 2010), a study related to the diffusion of International Accountability Standards, and in Fiss and Zajac (2006), a study on strategic responses of German organizations to change.…”

The change in environmental perception in strategic plans: the case of local governments in Turkey

“…Very few studies focus on strategic plans as a result of planning (e.g. Mazzara, 2010;Lega et al, 2013;Manoharan et al, 2015). Though there are few theoretical and conceptual studies revealing that strategic planning contributes to change (e.g.…”