2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3089832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling of a Wideband Dual-Polarized Large-Scale Antenna Array With Dielectric Stubs

Abstract: A technique of decoupling dielectric stubs (DDS) is proposed for mutual coupling reduction of wideband, dualpolarized, and large-scale antenna arrays in this paper, where a low dielectric constant DDS is mounting on a dual-polarized and wideband antenna array seamlessly. The decoupling mechanism of the proposed DDS is qualitatively explained. By properly optimizing the dielectric constant and dimensions of the dielectric stubs, the DDS can reduce the mutual couplings between array elements efficiently. The die… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it increases the design complexity of the ADS. The array with TMS in this work has a lower profile than the array proposed in [32]. In addition, a low dielectric constant of the DDS is needed because a higher dielectric constant negatively deteriorates the impedance match of the antenna element.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it increases the design complexity of the ADS. The array with TMS in this work has a lower profile than the array proposed in [32]. In addition, a low dielectric constant of the DDS is needed because a higher dielectric constant negatively deteriorates the impedance match of the antenna element.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is not available to be scaled up to dual-polarized arrays because it will increase the coupling in the orthogonal modes. Many decoupling methods for the massive MIMO arrays have been reported [27][28][29][30][31][32]. A non-resonant metasurface (NMS) with a was proposed in [27] to suppress the propagation of the space waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… References Characteristics Method of decoupling Edge to edge element Spacing Complexity of decoupling method Decoupling level (pol. isolation) (dB) Frequency (GHz) Antenna type 51 Modified array antenna decoupling surface Defected ground structures 0.034 λ 0 High with 3D structure and two-stage design 26 3.7 Patch 52 Ceramic superstrate-based decoupling method 0.28 λ 0 Medium with 3D structure 25 3.5 Dipole 53 Central-symmetry decoupling technique 0.11 λ 0 Low 22 2.5 Patch 54 Mixed radiation modes 0.11 λ 0 Medium with 3D structure 23 2.5 Patch 55 Decoupling dielectric stubs 0.27 λ 0 Medium with 3D structure 20 4.75 Patch 56 Frequency selective surface 0.22 λ 0 Medium with 3D structure 18 4 Patch 57 Array-antenna decoupling surface 0.0...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 26 ], a 4 × 4 staggered array with diversified phase laggings and coupling level lower than −25 dB is designed by loading the ADS. In [ 27 ], the decoupling dielectric stubs (DDS) are proposed to reduce the mutual couplings of a 4 × 4 antenna array below −25 dB from 4.4 to 4.8 GHz. However, it requires a relatively high profile (half wavelength).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%