“…Because of the high level of automation, sophistication, reliability, and reproducibility of GPC instrumentation, a much higher resolution of data can be produced for mechanistic studies in comparison to basic solvent extraction techniques; this makes it the best tool for understanding the MWD of polymers. The separation of the GPC curve into individual Flory distribution curves provides detailed information regarding the active site distribution on the basis of fractions that have distinct molecular weight profiles; this leads to a lot of insight into the polymerization mechanism 4–14. The deconvolution of the MWDs of polymer resins, which is used for the characterization of polymer resins with broad and/or bimodal MWDs, has been carried out by various methodologies, such as the Haarhoff‐Van der Linde function,4 commercial software (Scientist,5 Peakfit,6 Microsoft Excel Solver7), and the Levenberg–Marquardt and Golub–Pereyra methods 8…”