2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2502922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing Wheat Price Spikes: A Model of Supply and Demand, Financial Speculation, and Commodity Price Comovement

Abstract: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require altern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from direct effects of adverse weather events, several authors have ascribed a dominant role to export restrictions imposed by several important producer countries in response to yield shortfalls, further reducing world market supply and thus amplifying the price response to the yield shocks [5,7,8]. A similar argument has been made for the demand side, namely that importing countries, in response to an initial price rise, started to buy larger than usual quantities in an attempt to restock inventories and insure themselves against further price rises, thus collectively amplifying those very price rises [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from direct effects of adverse weather events, several authors have ascribed a dominant role to export restrictions imposed by several important producer countries in response to yield shortfalls, further reducing world market supply and thus amplifying the price response to the yield shocks [5,7,8]. A similar argument has been made for the demand side, namely that importing countries, in response to an initial price rise, started to buy larger than usual quantities in an attempt to restock inventories and insure themselves against further price rises, thus collectively amplifying those very price rises [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kilian and Murphy (2013), Kilian and Lee (2013), and Fattouh et al (2013) show that this last explanation is not supported by oil market data, making it implausible that it would apply to other commodity markets, and allowing us to focus on the first three explanations. For more direct evidence on the role of financial speculation in the wheat market see Janzen, Carter, Smith and Adjemian (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2007/2008 ending stocks-to-use ratio for hard spring wheat was even lower, reaching about 11 percent. This conclusion finds additional support in the work of Janzen et al (2014), who estimate an SVAR model and find that MN spring wheat futures prices in February 2008 would have been 62 and 36 percent lower in the absence of net supply and precautionary demand shocks, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%