2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing constructive criticism: The nature of academic emotions associated with constructive, positive, and negative feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, gender did not give rise to differences in the students' perception of the logbook, which is in line with Fong et al (2016) [55]. However, there were marked differences in the participation rates in this study between female and male students, particularly in the sixth-year, with a larger number of females being involved (82.4% and 32.4%, respectively, as shown in Table 1).…”
Section: Gendersupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, gender did not give rise to differences in the students' perception of the logbook, which is in line with Fong et al (2016) [55]. However, there were marked differences in the participation rates in this study between female and male students, particularly in the sixth-year, with a larger number of females being involved (82.4% and 32.4%, respectively, as shown in Table 1).…”
Section: Gendersupporting
confidence: 81%
“…But this question is also theoretically relevant. For instance, another plausible explanation of the evaluative recall bias is that evaluative comments preferentially capture attention, perhaps because these comments can feel destructive where directive feedback feels constructive (Fong et al, 2016). Studies from many areas of psychological science…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the process model of constructive criticism, the properties for a message to be perceived as constructive criticism include being well-intentioned, appropriate targeting and provide guidance for improvement [ 105 ], which appear to suggest a specific profile for comments to be construed as constructive criticism. Another study also similarly found an overwhelming consensus across an undergraduate sample in perceptions of constructive criticism where definitions nearly always included an element of improvement, which was noted to suggest an understanding of constructive criticism messages as intending to improve performance [ 106 ]. Hence, the present finding, along with those from previous studies, suggest that the tendency to perceive criticism as constructive may be more contingent on characteristics of the message itself and the relational context due to the mostly unambiguous nature of messages of constructive criticism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%