2000
DOI: 10.1109/36.851780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
195
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of the highest two peaks was then used as the mean values ( j ) of the two Gaussian components. Based on the fact that the single Gaussian has two inflection points, the zero crossing of the second derivative was used to obtain the positions of the inflection points of each Gaussian component, and hence the Gaussian's half width (σ j ) was calculated (Hofton et al, 2000).…”
Section: Gaussian Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of the highest two peaks was then used as the mean values ( j ) of the two Gaussian components. Based on the fact that the single Gaussian has two inflection points, the zero crossing of the second derivative was used to obtain the positions of the inflection points of each Gaussian component, and hence the Gaussian's half width (σ j ) was calculated (Hofton et al, 2000).…”
Section: Gaussian Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Gaussian fit to the profile of first return heights was computed as an additional means of characterizing canopy vertical structure (i.e., with the number of Gaussians (NG) used to describe the profile). We followed the approach described in Hofton et al [55] for large-footprint Lidar waveforms. For the Gaussian fit to the ALS canopy height profiles (see example in Figure 2), the single-bin peak at 0 m height (i.e., the forest floor) was not considered so that the Gaussian fit only reflected the vegetation profile.…”
Section: Stand-level Canopy Structure Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose to use a single Gaussian peak to model Y , rather than a mixture. To derive a method that is robust to overlaps (when the left side of the ground peak is contaminated by nearby peaks from low vegetation, animals or objects, received just before the ground return), it seems natural to perform a Gaussian decomposition, using techniques from [14] or [15], then keep the last peak. Unfortunately, not only are these methods complex, as they rely on nonlinear optimization, they are also unstable and lack robustness.…”
Section: Partial Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%