2018
DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2018.81007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of <i>Eucalyptus sp.</i> and <i>Pinus taeda</i> Harvest Residues under Controlled Temperature and Moisture Conditions

Abstract: Background: Following the harvest of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the end of the 1.5-year study period, the total amount of N released from decomposing A. mangium harvest residues was 137 kg ha −1 , 35% of which released from bark. In contrast, bark made no net contribution to the release of N from harvest residues of E. dunnii and E. globulus for up to two years [16,17] and E. grandis, E. globulus, E. dunnii, and Pinus taeda L. for up to six months following harvest [59]. While the quantities of N taken up by A. mangium can be as much as 180 kg ha −1 yr −1 in the first two years of growth [21], A. mangium bark residue can potentially make an important contribution to this demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the end of the 1.5-year study period, the total amount of N released from decomposing A. mangium harvest residues was 137 kg ha −1 , 35% of which released from bark. In contrast, bark made no net contribution to the release of N from harvest residues of E. dunnii and E. globulus for up to two years [16,17] and E. grandis, E. globulus, E. dunnii, and Pinus taeda L. for up to six months following harvest [59]. While the quantities of N taken up by A. mangium can be as much as 180 kg ha −1 yr −1 in the first two years of growth [21], A. mangium bark residue can potentially make an important contribution to this demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of K and Ca was very rapid, especially during the first three months of decomposition, and reflected the high K and Ca concentrations in the harvest residues. Such rapid release of K is commonly found in plantations across a range of environments [16,17,20,59] because K is highly mobile; hence its rapid leaching by rain soon after placement of the mesh bags in a number of related experiments [16,17,67,68]. The rapid release of Ca and decline in Ca concentration in harvest residues is linked to the rapid release rates of Ca oxalate [69,70], which accounts for 20-56% of total Ca in fresh plant tissues [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, forest residues have high C:N ratio (Gama-Rodrigues and Barros, 2002;Sanchez et al, 2018), and there are indications that the limit between mineralization and immobilization occurs with N concentration of around 7.9 g kg − 1 (Cotrufo et al, 2013).Thus, we hypothesized that retention of eucalyptus harvest residues on the soil surface contributes to nutrient cycling, improves soil fertility, and reduces the need for fertilizer in Eucalyptus urograndis plantations. The objective of this study was to assess the release of nutrients from the decomposition of eucalyptus harvest residues, and their stocks in areas subjected to two different eucalyptus harvesting systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nutrient concentration and its stoichiometry should not be neglected when investigating influencing factors over decomposition processes such as lignin:N ratios that are associated with slower decomposition rates (Mungai and Motavalli, 2006;Sánchez et al, 2018), especially in the later stages of decomposition (Berg and McClaugherty, 2003). Among harvest residues, branches and bark fractions present a lower rate of decomposition when compared to the leaf fraction and this result is mainly attributed to the high C:N and lignin:N ratios (Zhang et al, 2008;Sánchez et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient concentration and its stoichiometry should not be neglected when investigating influencing factors over decomposition processes such as lignin:N ratios that are associated with slower decomposition rates (Mungai and Motavalli, 2006;Sánchez et al, 2018), especially in the later stages of decomposition (Berg and McClaugherty, 2003). Among harvest residues, branches and bark fractions present a lower rate of decomposition when compared to the leaf fraction and this result is mainly attributed to the high C:N and lignin:N ratios (Zhang et al, 2008;Sánchez et al, 2018). Nutrient stoichiometric relations during litter decomposition are indicative of each nutrient is limiting soil decomposer community (Lanuza et al, 2018;Siqueira et al, 2021), but the literature lacks information on eucalypt harvest residues decomposition and its nutrient relations over decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%