2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of acyclic normal currents in a metric space

Abstract: We prove that every acyclic normal one-dimensional real Ambrosio–Kirchheim current in a Polish (i.e. complete separable metric) space can be decomposed in curves, thus generalizing the analogous classical result proven by S. Smirnov in Euclidean space setting. The same assertion is true for every complete metric space under a suitable set-theoretic assumption

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we slightly strengthen [25, theorem 6.1] relating it to the superposition principle, whenever the underlying space E is a Banach space with Radon-Nikodym property and strictly convex norm, by proving that any measure on curves provided by the latter for the continuity equation satisfied by the naturally defined flow of µ, in fact represents the same vector field of T , or, in other words, represents a normal current in space with the same underlying vector field as T and with different mass measure (still absolutely continuous with respect to that of T ). Let us stress that our proof technique is based on the more recent approach of [24], ultimately relying on a reduction to polygonal currents, and not on Smirnov's original proof. In fact, in view of Smirnov's original argument, it seems reasonable that it should allow one to deduce a superposition results for currents from that for continuity equations, reversing our main implication (of course, one should first establish a general result for continuity equations by other means).…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we slightly strengthen [25, theorem 6.1] relating it to the superposition principle, whenever the underlying space E is a Banach space with Radon-Nikodym property and strictly convex norm, by proving that any measure on curves provided by the latter for the continuity equation satisfied by the naturally defined flow of µ, in fact represents the same vector field of T , or, in other words, represents a normal current in space with the same underlying vector field as T and with different mass measure (still absolutely continuous with respect to that of T ). Let us stress that our proof technique is based on the more recent approach of [24], ultimately relying on a reduction to polygonal currents, and not on Smirnov's original proof. In fact, in view of Smirnov's original argument, it seems reasonable that it should allow one to deduce a superposition results for currents from that for continuity equations, reversing our main implication (of course, one should first establish a general result for continuity equations by other means).…”
Section: Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of type (C) for De Rham currents have been proven first by S. Smirnov [28] (later several different proofs have been given for partial results of this kind, see e.g. [27] and references therein, and also [16] for an interesting discrete analogue), and for general metric current in [24,26]. In this paper we show in fact that the result on representation of acyclic metric currents provides (A) for general metric spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then 13) and ψ x and is (C/r n )-Lipschitz on B 0 : this is easy to check, noting that Proof. If u(y) = 1, then…”
Section: Graphs and Flowsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…By [13, Theorem 5.1], a normal acyclic 1-current T on X is decomposable in arcs. Combining [13,Definition 4.4] and [13,Lemma 4.17], this means that there exists a transport η on Γ such that η almost every curve in Γ is an arc, and moreover the following equalities hold: Now, we apply the decomposition result to our concrete situation. Assume that s, t ∈ X, and T is a GPC joining s to t, as in Definition 1.3.…”
Section: Gpc and Pencils Of Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation