Decomposing Inequality in Household Consumption Expenditure in Malaysia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the sources and determinants of consumption expenditure inequality in Malaysia as well as to quantify their proportional contributions to the total explained inequality using the Household Expenditure Survey (HES) data for the year 2014 collected from the Malaysian Department of Statistics (DOSM). The study applies Field’s regression-based decomposition method to the log-linear regression model of per capita monthly consumption expenditure. It is found that the model explains about 55.2% of the variability in the logged monthly consumption expenditure per capita. The findings suggest that the size of households, education of household heads, and regional variations are the major contributing factors to consumption expenditure inequality in Malaysia, with household size being among the highest. Other household head characteristics, including ethnicity, strata, and citizenship, have small contributions to the total explained inequality. However, sex and age of household heads contributed negatively to inequality and have inequality decreasing effects, with a negative impact on inequality. A large percentage of unexplained inequality is not captured by these factors, which may be attributed to either unobserved household attributes or residuals. The results are important for policy implications and should be taken into account in formulating future policies, especially those aiming to reduce inequality among the population and thus improving living standards and well-being.

The pattern of poor household food consumption: The case of West Java Province

“…Mean-while, the years of schooling have a negative and significant effect in determining the grain expenditure share. This is in line with (Kirk et al, 2018;Ayyash & Sek, 2020), which stated that the education of heads of households has a positive effect on animal-sourced food expenditure share (beef and pork). Consumers with higher levels of education will have better access to information than consumers with low levels of education.…”

Prevalence and determinants of medications non-adherence among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in primary care setting in Sarawak, Malaysia: A cross-sectional study

“…Approximately 82.4% had a monthly household income below RM 3,000 (USD 675), which is the median income for the bottom 40% of the income household group according to the Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey conducted in 2016 by the Department of Statistics. 19 …”

Income Inequality in Mountain Areas: The Case of Agroforestry Farming Systems in Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania

“…The study found age and household size to be negatively influencing expenditure and household income contributing to widen income inequality. In Malaysia, Ayyash and Sek (2020) found sex and age of household heads to be contributing negatively to inequality and had inequality decreasing effects, with negative impact on inequality. Elsewhere, in South Korea, Shin (2020) analysed data linking survey data with administrative data shows that wealth, employment status, family size, and education were significant contributors of income inequality.…”