2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.04.009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding selective auditory attention with EEG using a transformer model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decoding selective auditory attention with EEG using a transformer model (Xu et al, 2022): Xu et al (2022a) propose a transformer architecture to decode auditory attention in a competing two-talker scenario. The aim is to investigate whether an end-to-end nonlinear framework can outperform state-of-the-art linear models.…”
Section: Transformersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoding selective auditory attention with EEG using a transformer model (Xu et al, 2022): Xu et al (2022a) propose a transformer architecture to decode auditory attention in a competing two-talker scenario. The aim is to investigate whether an end-to-end nonlinear framework can outperform state-of-the-art linear models.…”
Section: Transformersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in line with studies applying nonlinear deep neural networks. Better performance for deep neural networks compared to linear models have been reported in the past (Accou et al, 2021;Ciccarelli et al, 2019;de Taillez et al, 2020;Monesi et al, 2020;Vandecappelle et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2022). Yet, previous studies applied these models to different protocols, namely auditory attention decoding or a match-mismatch classification paradigm, and were often trained subject-independently.…”
Section: Beyond Linear Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these differences, the modalities require different preprocessing and processing steps. First, while EEG can provide whole-brain coverage, and thus participant-specific data are used in EEG ( Karimi et al, 2022 ; Moon et al, 2022 ; Xu et al, 2022 ), ECoG has very limited brain coverage as electrode coverage is dictated by medical reasons for each individual; as such usually, the data are pooled across subjects from different participants to provide a wider coverage ( Sellers et al, 2019 ; Yang et al, 2019 ; Ahmadipour et al, 2021 ). Second, single trial ECoG data can provide reliable information ( Jacques et al, 2016b ; Haufe et al, 2018 ); however, it is typical to average several trials in EEG to reduce noise and acquire higher SNR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%