2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding Reveals Plasticity in V3A as a Result of Motion Perceptual Learning

Abstract: Visual perceptual learning (VPL) is defined as visual performance improvement after visual experiences. VPL is often highly specific for a visual feature presented during training. Such specificity is observed in behavioral tuning function changes with the highest improvement centered on the trained feature and was originally thought to be evidence for changes in the early visual system associated with VPL. However, results of neurophysiological studies have been highly controversial concerning whether the pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
38
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(77 reference statements)
6
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea is consistent with other perceptual learning studies on form discrimination (Zhang et al, 2010a), orientation discrimination (Jehee et al, 2012), and motion detection (Shibata et al, 2012). However, it should be noted that these studies only measured the neural changes immediately after training, but not longer-term changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This idea is consistent with other perceptual learning studies on form discrimination (Zhang et al, 2010a), orientation discrimination (Jehee et al, 2012), and motion detection (Shibata et al, 2012). However, it should be noted that these studies only measured the neural changes immediately after training, but not longer-term changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Shibata et al (2012) also found that motion detection training only affected V3A. These findings seem to contradict the long-standing belief that MT+ is the neural substrate of motion perceptual learning as demonstrated by earlier studies (Zohary et al, 1994;Vaina et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…We reasoned that if training could improve the neural representations of the motion stimuli (especially in the trained direction), as suggested by the TMS and psychophysical results, it was possible that decoding accuracies for the orthogonal directions could be improved by training. Similar approaches have been used previously (19)(20)(21). Before training, a repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of stimulus coherence level and a significant interaction between stimulus coherence level and area [V3A and MT+; both F(1,11) > 7.87l P < 0.05; Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Perceptual learning requires long training sessions repeated over several days in combination with positive reward (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). In spite of extensive research, it is still debated whether perceptual learning fine-tunes the neuronal responses at level of primary visual cortex or whether the effect primarily lies in associative cortices (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), which usually retain a higher level of plasticity in adulthood. More recently, psychophysical studies have revealed a form of adult plasticity after short-term deprivation, probably associated with an alteration of primary visual cortex processing, where deprivation paradoxically leads to enhanced sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%