2021
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declines and pronounced regional disparities in meperidine use in the United States

Abstract: There have been increasing concerns about adverse effects and drug interactions with meperidine. The goal of this study was to characterize meperidine use in the United States. Meperidine distribution data were obtained from the Drug Enforcement Administration's Automated of Reports and Consolidated Orders System. The Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File was utilized to capture overall trends in national prescriptions in this observational report. Nationally, meperidine distribution decreased by 94.6% fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for the pronounced regional disparity in Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas could be a result from the cultural roots of codeine consumption. Arkansas and Oklahoma also led the US for highest population corrected use of another weak opioid, meperidine (29). On the other hand, the regional disparity could be a result of the complex interplay between variations in health status, attitudes and cultural responses to health care, and access to health care in Texas and its neighboring states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the pronounced regional disparity in Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas could be a result from the cultural roots of codeine consumption. Arkansas and Oklahoma also led the US for highest population corrected use of another weak opioid, meperidine (29). On the other hand, the regional disparity could be a result of the complex interplay between variations in health status, attitudes and cultural responses to health care, and access to health care in Texas and its neighboring states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the state-level variation in 2016 for the MME total of eight opioids used for pain was 3.6 fold between Tennessee (932 MME/person) and Washington D.C. (256 MME/person) (7). The difference for individual opioids was 4.3 fold for fentanyl to hospitals, 6.2 for fentanyl to pharmacies (9), but 18-fold for meperidine (8) and almost 20-fold different for buprenorphine (11). We do not believe that there are four-fold biological nociceptive differences between the residents of Tennessee relative to those in an adjacent state (e.g., Kentucky) that receive much less morphine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a myriad of reasons that may explain this decline, including increased awareness of the addictive nature of opioids [22], continued escalation in opioid-related overdose mortalities [1], and the increased government funding and resources resulting from the classification of the opioid crisis as a public health emergency [23]. Evidence has been more subtle or contradictory for any measurable impact of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs [24,25] or state opioid prescribing laws [12,15,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a five-fold difference between the lowest (North Dakota = 485) and highest (Rhode Island = 2,624) states [3]. Examination of individual opioids [9,10] revealed a three-fold state-level difference for fentanyl [11], eighteen-fold for meperidine [12], and twenty-fold for buprenorphine [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%