2005
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus--norepinephrine system.

Abstract: Psychologists and neuroscientists have had a long-standing interest in the P3, a prominent component of the event-related brain potential. This review aims to integrate knowledge regarding the neural basis of the P3 and to elucidate its functional role in information processing. The authors review evidence suggesting that the P3 reflects phasic activity of the neuromodulatory locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system. They discuss the P3 literature in the light of empirical findings and a recent theory reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

111
1,214
4
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,397 publications
(1,343 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
111
1,214
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis that the LC-NE system contributes to P3 generation during a target detection task is consistent with the allocation of attentional resources and arousal effects in humans [13,[17][18][19]. Monkey studies with the oddball paradigm have shown that the conditions for generating the P3 are highly similar to those for the LC phasic response: both are preferentially elicited by attended, task-relevant, arousing, and salient stimuli that are important for goal-directed behavior [15,20]. Furthermore, the timing and topographic distribution of intracranial and scalp-recorded P3 activity are consistent with the anatomical and physiological activation of temporoparietal areas by the LC-NE system [13,15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The hypothesis that the LC-NE system contributes to P3 generation during a target detection task is consistent with the allocation of attentional resources and arousal effects in humans [13,[17][18][19]. Monkey studies with the oddball paradigm have shown that the conditions for generating the P3 are highly similar to those for the LC phasic response: both are preferentially elicited by attended, task-relevant, arousing, and salient stimuli that are important for goal-directed behavior [15,20]. Furthermore, the timing and topographic distribution of intracranial and scalp-recorded P3 activity are consistent with the anatomical and physiological activation of temporoparietal areas by the LC-NE system [13,15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Converging evidence from animal, genetic, and pharmacological studies suggests that the P3 component of the scalprecorded ERP reflects the phasic activity of the neuromodulatory LC-NE system [15,16]. The hypothesis that the LC-NE system contributes to P3 generation during a target detection task is consistent with the allocation of attentional resources and arousal effects in humans [13,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, both the FRN and the reward positivity ERP components typically constitute a 'complex' with the following P3 component peaking at approximately between 300 and 500 ms [27][28][29]. The P3 is thought to reflect a more thorough evaluative process of the outcome events [30][31][32], including the local and global probabilistic properties, motivational significance of the stimuli, and also the amount of expended/invested attention [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, both the FRN and the reward positivity ERP components typically constitute a 'complex' with the following P3 component peaking at approximately between 300 and 500 ms [27][28][29]. The P3 is thought to reflect a more thorough evaluative process of the outcome events [30][31][32], including the local and global probabilistic properties, motivational significance of the stimuli, and also the amount of expended/invested attention [33].Data collected in various experimental conditions in which inferences of reinforcement learning were addressed via feedback-related evaluation processes show an age-dependent decrease regarding the amplitudes of feedback-related ERP components [34][35][36]. Accordingly, imaging approaches suggest that the elderly have difficulties in representing outcome values during predictive processing due to decreased frontostriatal connectivity with age [5,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%