2022
DOI: 10.3390/w14081231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Making Model for Municipal Wastewater Conventional Secondary Treatment with Bayesian Networks

Abstract: Technical, economic, regulatory, environmental, and social and political interests make the process of selecting an appropriate wastewater treatment technology complex. Although this problem has already been addressed from the dimensioning approach, our proposal in this research, a model of decision making for conventional secondary treatment of municipal wastewater through continuous-discrete, non-parametric Bayesian networks was developed. The most suitable network was structured in unit processes, independe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerobic systems are suitable for the treatment of low-strength wastewaters, while anaerobic systems are suitable for high-strength wastewaters. Anaerobic treatment requires less energy and has the potential for bioenergy and nutrient recovery, but aerobic treatment achieves higher removal of soluble biodegradable organic matter, resulting in lower effluent suspended solids concentration and generally higher effluent quality [5,6]. The combination of these two approaches offers the potential for enhanced treatment efficiency and improved removal of pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerobic systems are suitable for the treatment of low-strength wastewaters, while anaerobic systems are suitable for high-strength wastewaters. Anaerobic treatment requires less energy and has the potential for bioenergy and nutrient recovery, but aerobic treatment achieves higher removal of soluble biodegradable organic matter, resulting in lower effluent suspended solids concentration and generally higher effluent quality [5,6]. The combination of these two approaches offers the potential for enhanced treatment efficiency and improved removal of pollutants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%