Decision making for technological executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance [Review Reviews]

Linstone, Harold A.

doi:10.1109/tem.2000.865908

Cited by 61 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Координационное совещание. Структуриро-ванный формат заявки исследовательских тем устано-вил общие рамки для сбора основного массива инфор-мации, пригодного для предметной оценки по общему набору критериев [Linstone, 1999]. Исходя из руководя-щих принципов Программы и учитывая рациональ-ность затрат на оценку тем, было решено ограничиться тремя критериями: осуществимостью, актуальностью для промышленности и новизной.…”

Section: мастер-классunclassified

“…Исходя из руководя-щих принципов Программы и учитывая рациональ-ность затрат на оценку тем, было решено ограничиться тремя критериями: осуществимостью, актуальностью для промышленности и новизной. Они отражают цели Vision 2030, в частности, признаны значимыми для анализа различных областей и достаточно обширными для охвата множества точек зрения [Linstone, 1999].…”

Section: мастер-классunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing National Priorities for the Forest-Based Sector Technology Platform

Brummer¹,

Коннола²,

Salo³

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: мастер-классunclassified

Developing National Priorities for the Forest-Based Sector Technology Platform

Brummer¹,

Коннола²,

Salo³

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, apart from relevance and possible counters, argumentative inquiry does not provide much advice on how to critique evidence beyond saying that it should be convincing. Here systems thinking (Ulrich, 1983) and Linstone's (1999) multiple perspectives can be of some use. Systems thinking prompts questions like, "Where is the boundary, the inter-connectivity, the purpose, the transformation and the stakeholders" perspective?"…”

Section: Argumentative Inquiry and Systems Thinkingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…My 9 concern is that they may have inadvertently led new researchers to think that generalizability is in some way central to interpretive systems research when this richer research tradition has a very different set of priorities. At least five different research perspectives provide examples of these priorities, notably in the now extensive argumentative (Rehg, 1999), systems inquiry (Churchman, 1971), perspectival thinking (Linstone, 1999;Haynes, 2000), actionable knowledge (Argyris, 1996) and critical social theory (Alvesson and Skoldberg, 2000) literature. Moreover, any discussion of generalizabilty might want to address Popper's (1963) critique of induction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critique of Generalizability in Interpretive Research

Metcalfe¹,

Lynch²

2002

AJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is about generalizability in interpretive systems research. The authors are concerned that, in its search for appropriate inquiry methods, the discipline of Information Systems (IS) does not slip into the errors of other social disciplines and become a dismal science. Many systems thinkers have repeatedly argued that the purpose of IS research needs to be to produce what Argyris calls actionable knowledge and Ulrich, critique heuristics. That is, rules of thumb which managers can use to solve design problems, not too vague and not too detailed. This is a different concept from generalizability, which aligns with the scientific notion of seeking universal objective laws. The paper uses the argumentative inquiry in its reflexive capacity to critique knowledge claims on a chapter by Baskerville and Lee that discusses generalizability to bring out the differences between this cornerstone of universal truths and the more systems thinking concepts of actionable knowledge or critical heuristics.

show abstract

“…A adoção de uma visão integr ada de múltiplas perspectivas, para usar uma terminologia adotada por Linstone (1999), constitui um incremento do processo das estratégias de gestão, ajustável ao contexto que dita as agendas das organizações envolvidas com inovações abrangentes e multifacetadas. Além disso, é igualmente importante evitar o isolamento entre os campos do saber, o que Latour (2000) designa como a babel das disciplinas, ou seja, os economistas da inovação ignorando os sociólogos da tecnologia, que, por sua vez, não dialogam co m os engenheiros e assim por diante.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Pluraridade e pensamento sistêmico em projetos de telecomunicações

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

À medida que aumentam as necessidades de comunicação da sociedade e as relações entre os agentes do mercado se tornam cada vez mais complexas, o planejamento de novos bens ou serviços de telecomunicações requer a adoção de paradigmas sintonizados com o cenário que se delineia. A orientação que tradicionalmente baliza a concepção de novos projetos nesse setor expande-se de um foco técnico-econômico para um panorama que inclua as dimensões sociocultural e político-reguladora. O presente artigo discorre sobre o papel que um paradigma holístico, caracterizado por uma abordagem sistêmica e por uma visão pluralista, desempenha na concepção e na análise de viabilidade de projetos inovadores em telecomunicações, integrando as vertentes sociotécnica e técnico-econômica de análise. A reflexão aqui conduzida busca destacar a importância que o pensamento sistêmico, conjugado com abordagens de cunho qualitativo e que adotam múltiplas perspectivas, exerce em um contexto de análise ex ante de projetos de natureza complexa.

show abstract

Decision making for technological executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance [Review Reviews]

Cited by 61 publications

References 0 publications

Developing National Priorities for the Forest-Based Sector Technology Platform

Developing National Priorities for the Forest-Based Sector Technology Platform

A Critique of Generalizability in Interpretive Research

Pluraridade e pensamento sistêmico em projetos de telecomunicações

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About