Decision-making experiences of public library CEOs

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explore and describe the decision-making practices of public library managers in the context of interpersonal influence and evidence-based information sources, and to investigate the relationship between models of evidence-based practice and interpersonal influence in the decision-making process of public library managers. Design/methodology/approach -Data were collected through short audio blog posts participants made about their everyday decisions and coded considering the facets of three existing evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP) models as well as the facets of interpersonal influence. Findings -The findings show that public library CEOs decision-making behaviours reflect the use of a variety of practices from analytical to intuitive as is expected of managers in any sector; however, a stronger reliance on gathering objective information may be present than in other sectors. Seeking multiple sources of information and a tendency towards rationalism may indicate a more sophisticated approach to decision making, but be less indicative of the practices employed more broadly. A possible outcome of these tendencies may result in discordance with external partners and collaborators. Practical implications -The findings from this study may inform the work of associations, library and information science (LIS) educators, and library managers in developing strategic directions and instructional strategies within their organisations. It is also the first study to jointly examine models of interpersonal influence and evidence-based decision-making practices in any field. Originality/value -While the study of the decision-making practices of various groups is growing, little previous research has been conducted with public library managers, and none has been undertaken in Canada.

Top managers in public organizations: A systematic literature review and future research directions

“…Decision-making Top managers' decision-making is a complex process where they need to navigate constraints to pursue multiple goals (Anderson & Smirnova, 2006). It is argued that public sector chief executive officers (CEOs) rely more on objective information and rationalism than those in other sectors (Stenstrom, 2015). Unlike decisions made by line managers or middle-level managers, senior managers' decisions not only imply critical resource allocation internally but may also affect opportunities and constraints of external actors.…”

A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study: Experiences of Senior Executives’ Decision Making on Transformational Initiatives in a Fortune 100 Company

“…As Figure 3 showed, decision making evolved over the years and included mathematics, various techniques including decision trees, rationality/behavioral theories, computer models, as well as conscious and unconscious components. From 2006 to present quantum cognitive models (White, Pothos & Busemeyer, 2015), behavior models (Luoma, 2016), political influence (Thompson, Buch, & Kuvaas, 2017), nudging approach (Gore & Conway, 2016), evidence-based decision making (Stenstrom, 2015), and big data analytics (Popovič, Hackney, Tassabehji, & Castelli, 2018) are a few of the most recent theories of exploration in the realm of decision making, especially as related to organizational and management theory. Aritz, Walker, Cardon, and Li (2017) claimed decision making has been at the core of organizational analysis for the last half century.…”