2014
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks

Abstract: Co-occurrence networks produced from microbial survey sequencing data are frequently used to identify interactions between community members. While this approach has potential to reveal ecological processes, it has been insufficiently validated due to the technical limitations inherent in studying complex microbial ecosystems. Here, we simulate multi-species microbial communities with known interaction patterns using generalized Lotka-Volterra dynamics. We then construct co-occurrence networks and evaluate how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
903
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,247 publications
(997 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
13
903
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence is emerging for their applicability at the micro scale as well-for example, in describing the microbial dynamics in a cheese model community (Mounier et al, 2008) and within individuals (Gerber 2014), as well as their shifts in response to environmental perturbations (Pepper and Rosenfeld, 2012). Previous investigation in this area mostly tested standard correlation metrics not developed for microbiome data (Berry and Widder, 2014). We created two-and six-species Lotka-Volterra interactions (Supplementary Figure 15) and tested whether tools accurately capture these relationships when they are embedded in random noisy signals.…”
Section: Sampling Significantly Alters Edge Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence is emerging for their applicability at the micro scale as well-for example, in describing the microbial dynamics in a cheese model community (Mounier et al, 2008) and within individuals (Gerber 2014), as well as their shifts in response to environmental perturbations (Pepper and Rosenfeld, 2012). Previous investigation in this area mostly tested standard correlation metrics not developed for microbiome data (Berry and Widder, 2014). We created two-and six-species Lotka-Volterra interactions (Supplementary Figure 15) and tested whether tools accurately capture these relationships when they are embedded in random noisy signals.…”
Section: Sampling Significantly Alters Edge Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without an understanding of these important properties, correlation analysis risks diverting attention from meaningful interactions and leading to wasteful pursuit of expensive in vitro or in vivo validations of mechanisms. One previous effort in this area tested mainly basic correlation measures for one type of model system (Berry and Widder, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of network indices for individual nodes further corroborated the pivotal role of the MCG lineage in the structuration of the network (Table 1). Indeed, looking at the ranking of nodes for the 10 highest values of each index, MCG nodes were the most represented and particularly for closeness centrality, which has been recently related to the concept of keystone species (Berry and Widder, 2014). In this concept initially developed for macroorganisms, keystone species are commonly understood as the 'backbone' of the community on which the stability of the entire system depends (Paine, 1969).…”
Section: Evolutionary Relationships Between Freshwater and Marine Mcgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-occurrence networks examine interactions between members of a community (Faust and Raes, 2012;Berry and Widder, 2014). Co-occurrence networks can reveal ecologically important correlations in data by testing each pair-wise interaction between features (OTUs) in a data set.…”
Section: Co-occurence Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%