2015
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights in the ecology and evolutionary history of the Miscellaneous Crenarchaeotic Group lineage

Abstract: Members of the archaeal Miscellaneous Crenarchaeotic Group (MCG) are among the most successful microorganisms on the planet. During its evolutionary diversification, this very diverse group has managed to cross the saline-freshwater boundary, one of the most important evolutionary barriers structuring microbial communities. However, the current understanding on the ecological significance of MCG in freshwater habitats is scarce and the evolutionary relationships between freshwater and saline MCG remains poorly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
92
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
9
92
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports recent metagenomic studies, which showed that besides gut and rumen environments (6,13,14), Methanomassiliicoccales also occur ubiquitously in marine and terrestrial anaerobic environments (10,15,82,83). Similarly to the case for WOR, 16S rRNA gene sequences of Methanomassiliicoccales were not reported for the investigated sites, likely due to a mismatch of commonly used primers against hitherto-undetected clades (22), while other uncultured Thermoplasmata were detected (84).…”
Section: Lipid Inventory Of M Luminyensis Compared To Other Archaeasupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This supports recent metagenomic studies, which showed that besides gut and rumen environments (6,13,14), Methanomassiliicoccales also occur ubiquitously in marine and terrestrial anaerobic environments (10,15,82,83). Similarly to the case for WOR, 16S rRNA gene sequences of Methanomassiliicoccales were not reported for the investigated sites, likely due to a mismatch of commonly used primers against hitherto-undetected clades (22), while other uncultured Thermoplasmata were detected (84).…”
Section: Lipid Inventory Of M Luminyensis Compared To Other Archaeasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, we evaluated commonly used primers against Methanomassiliicoccales, including the one used to sequence archaea from WOR sediments (22,80), using TestPrime 1.0 and the SILVA SSU r126 RefNR database (81), and the coverage was only between 0.5% and 56% for zero mismatches. Accordingly, the positive correlation of MCG with BDGTs in the WOR sediments (35) may instead result from the cooccurrence of MCG and Methanomassiliicoccales and/or uncultivated Thermoplasmata, such as TMEG and MBG-D, which was observed by operational taxonomic unit network analysis in various marine sediments (82). However, in samples where MBG-D dominate 16S rRNA clone libraries, both BDGTs and PDGTs were not detected, while GDGTs were the most abundant lipids (26).…”
Section: Lipid Inventory Of M Luminyensis Compared To Other Archaeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the archaeal groups, there is a dominance of Lokiarchaeota (MBG-B/ DSAG), MG-I, Bathyarchaeota (MCG), and Methanomicrobia. The Bathyarchaeota are arguably the most widespread and abundant members of sediment communities, with relative abundances anywhere between 1 and 100% and a very large phylogenetic diversity (Kubo et al 2012, Lloyd et al 2013, Fillol et al 2016. Stable isotopic analyses of subsurface sediments off Peru have indicated that Bathyarchaeota may have a heterotrophic metabolism, growing by assimilation of fossil organic matter (Biddle et al 2006).…”
Section: Traits For Selective Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(between 30.5 and 48.4 % of total archaeal 16S rRNA gene reads detected in those samples), we performed phylogenetic analyses to determine the diversity of subgroups of the MCG within these sediments. A total of 57 representative 16S rRNA gene reads assigned to MCG were extracted from the dataset and incorporated into a MCG phylogenetic tree of Fillol et al (2015) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Archaeal Diversity In the Surface And Subsurface Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%