2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized saddle-point dynamics solution for optimal power flow of distribution systems with multi-microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it takes an VOLUME 7, 2019 intolerably long time for MILP problem to be solved. The authors of [19] propose decentralized saddle point dynamics and quadratic programming to solve the optimal power problem. The methods suggested achieve low active power loss and high RES utilization.…”
Section: A Multi-microgrid Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, it takes an VOLUME 7, 2019 intolerably long time for MILP problem to be solved. The authors of [19] propose decentralized saddle point dynamics and quadratic programming to solve the optimal power problem. The methods suggested achieve low active power loss and high RES utilization.…”
Section: A Multi-microgrid Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure real-time capability and application, this study uses both IEEE 30-bus and 118-bus distribution systems to evaluate the performance and efficiency of the proposed system. The distribution systems used in this study are considered because they are widely used by the research community for MMG [14] and [19]. The internal topology of each MG as shown in Fig.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where C DR ij (t) is the compensation income of the jth user in the ith VPP at time t; C ESS ij (t) is the peak shaving income of the jth ESS in the ith VPP at time t; C DG ij,sell (t) is the electricity sales revenue of the jth DG in the ith VPP at time t; C DG ij,pub (t) is a quadratic cost function, which represents the penalty cost of the jth DG in the ith VPP at time t; ΔP ZY ij (t) is the transferable load response capacity of the jth user in the ith VPP at time t; ΔP XJ ij (t) is the curtailable load response capacity of the jth user in the ith VPP at time t; P c ij (t) is the charging power of the jth ESS in the ith VPP at time t; P d ij (t) is the discharging power of the jth ESS in the ith VPP at time t; μ XJ ij (t) is the curtailment state of the jth users in the ith VPP at time t; μ ZY ij (t) is the transfer state of the jth users in the ith VPP at time t; μ c ij (t) is the charging state of the jth ESS in the ith VPP at time t; μ d ij (t) is the discharging state of the jth ESS in the ith VPP at time t; μ DG ij (t) is the operation state of the jth DG in the ith VPP at time t; ρ DR ij (t) is the unit capacity compensation price of the jth DR in the ith VPP at time t; ρ(t) is the electricity price at time t; a h and b h are the coefficients of quadratic cost function (Wang et al, 2019); and P pre ij (t) is the forecasting output of the jth DG in the ith VPP at time t.…”
Section: Objective Function Of Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rated output of PV is shown in Table 2. In this paper, the system electricity price at the curtailable time is used to compensate for the curtailable load (Luo and Song, 2015), and 80% of the system electricity price at the transferable time is used to compensate the transferable load (Liu et al, ) a h 0.1 and b h 0 (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Case Study Case Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%