2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized receding horizon control for large scale dynamically decoupled systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
218
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
218
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, most existing decentralized MPC schemes [9,14,8,23,1] rely on the assumption of small coupling between subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, most existing decentralized MPC schemes [9,14,8,23,1] rely on the assumption of small coupling between subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent collection of existing algorithms [1] listed 35 different approaches. In addition, recent works on the topic include as significant examples [2], [3], [4], [10], [13], [5], [7], [8]. While many applications can be considered, such as the control of power networks [6] or electrical vehicle charging control [9], this article concentrates its attention on the control of water delivery canals.…”
Section: A Motivation and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, two research projects (HD-MPC and WIDE) are currently being carried out in Europe, both focused on the development of decentralised and distributed MPC techniques. Few works have been recently published in this area; see, e.g., [5,6,7,8,9,10], among others. However, there is a prior problem to be solved: the system decomposition into subsystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%