2009 33rd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop 2009
DOI: 10.1109/sew.2009.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Reasoning in Ambient Intelligence

Abstract: In Ambient Intelligence (AmI), reasoning is fundamental for identifying specific situations that may be meaningful and relevant to some applications. As in such systems usually not all context data is readily available to all reasoners within a system, these reasoning operations may need to evaluate context data collected from distributed sources and stored on different devices. This work proposes a middleware service for performing decentralized rule-based reasoning about context data targeting AmI systems in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…knowledge is distributed, but reasoning is local and agents do not exchange context information (Román et al, 2002); or are limited in their reasoning capabilities. For example, reasoning in (Viterbo and Endler, 2012) is distributed in that different computational nodes cooperate to infer a global context state; the reasoning process is however limited to ontology-based inference, and is not resilient to inaccurate or conflicting information. Finally, all existing knowledge-based reasoning approaches assume a single direction information flow: from sensor input, through to data analysis and decision-making, and then to reaction and control, irrespective of the extent to which each of these phases are decentralised (Snchez-Garzn et al, 2012;Valero et al, 2013).…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…knowledge is distributed, but reasoning is local and agents do not exchange context information (Román et al, 2002); or are limited in their reasoning capabilities. For example, reasoning in (Viterbo and Endler, 2012) is distributed in that different computational nodes cooperate to infer a global context state; the reasoning process is however limited to ontology-based inference, and is not resilient to inaccurate or conflicting information. Finally, all existing knowledge-based reasoning approaches assume a single direction information flow: from sensor input, through to data analysis and decision-making, and then to reaction and control, irrespective of the extent to which each of these phases are decentralised (Snchez-Garzn et al, 2012;Valero et al, 2013).…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%