2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized PID load frequency control for perturbed multi-area power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency deviation of area i ∆P 1 The intermediate power deviation of PV ∆P 3 Power deviation of governor ∆P 4 Power deviation of steam turbine ∆P 5 Power deviation of and re-heater ∆P ci Control signal of area i ∆P Li…”
Section: Nomenclature ∆F Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Frequency deviation of area i ∆P 1 The intermediate power deviation of PV ∆P 3 Power deviation of governor ∆P 4 Power deviation of steam turbine ∆P 5 Power deviation of and re-heater ∆P ci Control signal of area i ∆P Li…”
Section: Nomenclature ∆F Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past four decades, a variety of great achievements have been made for the LFC issueof traditional power systems. For example, as the most popular control technique, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller and its various variations have been widely applied to the LFC issue [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Moreover, some researchers have paid more attention to the advanced control theories based LFC methods recently, such as robust control theories [9], model predictive control [10][11][12][13][14], sliding mode control [15,16], neural network control [17], internal model control [18], and differential games [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires using a decentralized control strategy, since the dynamic response of each type of power plant is different from the others. Furthermore, the centralized control scheme is implemented with difficulty due to the excessive cost of transmitting data over the long distances as well as the errors, which might be caused accordingly [15]. Hence, the decentralized scheme is more accurate and realistic than the centralized control strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Load-frequency control (LFC) plays an important role in the operation of interconnected power systems to regulate the frequency and the tie line interchanges among different control areas [1]. There are many different control methods, which have been proposed in designing load frequency controllers with better performance to maintain the frequency and to keep tie line power flows within prespecified values during the last two decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The most conventional decentralized control methods for LFC are proportionalintegral control [1], proportional-double integral control [2], and PID control [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PI control has the advantage of a simple controller structure. But it can yield a long settling time and a large overshoot in transient response [4]. PID controller is an effective LFC when the system is operating in the vicinity of the nominal operating point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%