2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03246-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized beneficiary behavior in humanitarian supply chains: models, performance bounds, and coordination mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supply chain coordination and information sharing have a direct effect on organizational performance (DuHadway et al, 2019;Lee and Fernando, 2015;Liu et al, 2020). Muggy and Stamm (2020) had pointed out supply chain operations depends on beneficiaries and services needed. On the basis of such literature, authors also feel usage of AI in upstream supply chain will increase the horizon of the employees and will facilitate the human judgement.…”
Section: Research Question and Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply chain coordination and information sharing have a direct effect on organizational performance (DuHadway et al, 2019;Lee and Fernando, 2015;Liu et al, 2020). Muggy and Stamm (2020) had pointed out supply chain operations depends on beneficiaries and services needed. On the basis of such literature, authors also feel usage of AI in upstream supply chain will increase the horizon of the employees and will facilitate the human judgement.…”
Section: Research Question and Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors use variational equilibrium and the Lagrange multiplier theory in the model and illustrate the behaviour of the model under conditions resembling the impact of Hurricane Harvey in the US. Muggy and Heier Stamm (2020) propose a centralized and a decentralized decision model to decide which facilities will be selected by beneficiaries in evacuations. Both network congestion games minimize utility comprised of travel distance and congestion in the facility, with the decentralized model looking at individual utility and the centralized model considering the overall travel distance and congestion in the system.…”
Section: Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two common features were found in these articles. The preference for non cooperative games using monetary metrics captures the competition between organizations, but it does not account for agencies guided by an upper-level coordinator (except for the centralized model from Muggy and Heier Stamm (2020)). Additionally, in all cases the players and resources need to be known in advance and the use of the formulations can be complicated by the introduction of different sources of uncertainty.…”
Section: Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, gift-in-kind donations can reduce virus transmission by preventing people from leaving their houses to purchase goods. However, in the humanitarian context, beneficiaries themselves often perform the last-mile distribution, who collect the items at specific sites (Muggy & Stamm, 2020 ). Thus, depending on how pick-up procedures are organised, they may generate agglomeration points, spreading the virus.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%