2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566)
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2004.1389813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Bayesian negotiation for cooperative search

Abstract: Abslrael-This paper addresses the problem of m r d inating a team of multiple heterogeneous sensing platforms searching for a single lost target. In this approach, the utility of a control sequence is a function of the probability density function (PDF) of the target slate. Each decision maker builds an equivalent atimate of thb PDF by communicating and fusing the information from the other sensor nodes. Coupled utilities incite the agents to coUahorate and to agree on the nehi best set of actions. Decentraliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their purpose is to reduce the uncertainty about the target existence probability in its current cell and to avoid covering the same search area. But the information they get is from the flight base, which may be not enough [17]. So in our paper we present our framework to let the UAVs can decide where to go online step by step.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their purpose is to reduce the uncertainty about the target existence probability in its current cell and to avoid covering the same search area. But the information they get is from the flight base, which may be not enough [17]. So in our paper we present our framework to let the UAVs can decide where to go online step by step.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At step 0, ) 0 ( Since the observation z ij (1) is not available at time 0, it seems impossible to predict more than one-step ahead. However, before the observation z ij (1) is made, we can assume that the innovation,…”
Section: A Prediction In N-step Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]- [4], to be performed with greater efficiency than a single robot. The accuracy of information available about the targets determines which task is to be performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such missions include aerobiological sampling, persistent surveillance, formation control, distributed resource delivery, and target positioning [1,[3][4][5][6]. The tasks in these missions often require the agents to collaboratively sense, estimate, or reach agreement on global parameters/states, such as the states of the environment or shared variables related to task settings and assignments [7][8][9][10][11]. However, while low-cost agents have the potential to yield benefits such as scalability, cost-saving, and resiliency, these agents typically have limited onboard computation and communication resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%