2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory planning for multiple robots in bearing-only target localisation

Abstract: -This paper provides a solution to the optimal trajectory planning problem in target localisation for multiple heterogeneous robots with bearing-only sensors. The objective here is to find robot trajectories that maximise the accuracy of the locations of the targets at a prescribed terminal time. The trajectory planning is formulated as an optimal control problem for a nonlinear system with a gradually identified model and then solved using nonlinear Model Predictive Control (MPC). The solution to the MPC opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is not surprising that most existing approaches relax the constrains. For instance, full observability is assumed in [9,7], known robot location is assumed in [10], myopic planning is adopted in [8], and discretization of the state and/or actions spaces appears in [11,12,7]. The method proposed in this paper does not rely on any of these assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is not surprising that most existing approaches relax the constrains. For instance, full observability is assumed in [9,7], known robot location is assumed in [10], myopic planning is adopted in [8], and discretization of the state and/or actions spaces appears in [11,12,7]. The method proposed in this paper does not rely on any of these assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximization of the determinant of the FIM, a determinant lower bound, or a determinant approximation [2,5,6,[14][15][16] effectively minimizes the volume of the uncertainty ellipsoid around the target estimate, but highly eccentric ellipsoid shapes can result [17]. Similar options (sometimes only semantically different) include the trace of the CRLB [18], the trace of the covariance matrix [3], maximization of the smallest FIM eigenvalue [19], minimization of the trace of the inverse of the FIM [20], or minimization of the differential entropy of the posterior target density (equivalent to maximizing the FIM determinant for the Gaussian case) [21].…”
Section: Trajectory Optimization For Bearing-only Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables not intended to be constrained had values set well out of a realistic range, but not set at infinity to keep gradients meaningful. The potentially active constraints of C are shown in a consolidated notation: (19) The forward component, x, was limited to stay between the approach point, x app = x app_offset + x t , and the wall of the flight facility furthest from it (where the run was started). The approach point itself is only an estimate, changing each epoch, but it does provide some safety buffer until the desired target certainty is reached.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to approximate the belief as a Gaussian and linearize the dynamic and measurement models. These approximations allow trajectories to be evaluated quickly in a model predictive control (MPC) framework [6], [7]. However, these approximations are not always appropriate for nonlinear systems with non-Gaussian beliefs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%