2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2017.8263787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized abstractions and timed constrained planning of a general class of coupled multi-agent systems

Abstract: This paper presents a fully automated procedure for controller synthesis for a general class of multi-agent systems under coupling constraints. Each agent is modeled with dynamics consisting of two terms: the first one models the coupling constraints and the other one is an additional bounded control input. We aim to design these inputs so that each agent meets an individual high-level specification given as a Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL). Furthermore, the connectivity of the initially connected agent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first constraint denotes the fact that the robot should not intersect with any other RoI other than R i ,R j ; the second one, denotes the fact that the robot needs to remain in the workspace for all times. Define by q = e −ê the deviation between the real state of the system (4) and the nominal state of the system (5) with q(0) = e(0) −ê(0) = 0. The dynamics of the state q are given by:…”
Section: A Feedback Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first constraint denotes the fact that the robot should not intersect with any other RoI other than R i ,R j ; the second one, denotes the fact that the robot needs to remain in the workspace for all times. Define by q = e −ê the deviation between the real state of the system (4) and the nominal state of the system (5) with q(0) = e(0) −ê(0) = 0. The dynamics of the state q are given by:…”
Section: A Feedback Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this result established, we turn back to the remaining terms found in (I2) and, in particular, we focus on the integral: tk+1+Tp tk+Tp F i e 1,i (s), u 1,i (s) ds. We discern that the range of this integral has a length equal to the length of the interval where (14) of Assumption 6 holds. Integrating (14) over the interval [t k + T p , t k+1 + T p ], for the controls and states applicable in it we get:…”
Section: Appendix F Proof Of Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discern that the range of this integral has a length equal to the length of the interval where (14) of Assumption 6 holds. Integrating (14) over the interval [t k + T p , t k+1 + T p ], for the controls and states applicable in it we get:…”
Section: Appendix F Proof Of Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more details on NMPC, please refer toAllgwer et al (2004);Eqtami et al (2013a,b);Logothetis et al (2018);Nikou et al ( , 2018 and the paper cited and papers quoted therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%