2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralization and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible reason is that the eastern region tends to be economically developed and relatively well administered by the government, and enterprises have relatively higher market access and freedom, limiting the marginal impact of the reform of government functions on optimizing the business environment (Briguglio et al, 2019). In the central region, the reform of government functions can foster market competition and thus considerably enhance the business environment because market competition is somewhat insufficient due to the relatively underdeveloped economy and low level of government management (Li & Qi, 2023; Liu et al, 2021). Due to the remote location, the investment climate in the western region is relatively poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible reason is that the eastern region tends to be economically developed and relatively well administered by the government, and enterprises have relatively higher market access and freedom, limiting the marginal impact of the reform of government functions on optimizing the business environment (Briguglio et al, 2019). In the central region, the reform of government functions can foster market competition and thus considerably enhance the business environment because market competition is somewhat insufficient due to the relatively underdeveloped economy and low level of government management (Li & Qi, 2023; Liu et al, 2021). Due to the remote location, the investment climate in the western region is relatively poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%