2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12083-009-0062-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralising a service-oriented architecture

Abstract: Service-oriented computing is becoming an increasingly popular paradigm for modelling and building distributed systems in open and heterogeneous environments. However, proposed service-oriented architectures are typically based on centralised components, such as service registries or service brokers, that introduce reliability, management, and performance issues. This paper describes an approach to fully decentralise a service-oriented architecture using a selforganising peer-to-peer network maintained by serv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of locating higher capacity peers closer to the source than lower capacity peers is similar to the idea of gradient overlays, recently presented in [19], [20]. There are several main differences between these studies and ours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of locating higher capacity peers closer to the source than lower capacity peers is similar to the idea of gradient overlays, recently presented in [19], [20]. There are several main differences between these studies and ours.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…al. [19] does not target P2P streaming applications. It elects super peers with highest utility to discover globally similar neighbors, while lower utility peers have mostly random neighbors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the similar view, nodes prefer neighbors with closer utility values, while for the gradient view, nodes prefer nodes with higher, but closer, utility values. Together these preference functions build a topology where gradient paths of increasing utilities emerge in the system [12], see figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%