2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay rate of virus and faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in seawater and the concentration of FIBs in different wastewater systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last four decades, numerous studies have demonstrated that FIB, one of the most frequently used and easily measured water quality parameters (Ashbolt et al, 2001), do not correlate with or predict the presence of enteric viruses in treated (waste)water, shellfish, environmental waters, and fresh produce (Carducci et al, 2009, Eregno et al, 2018, Fout et al, 2017, Gerba et al, 2017, Griffin et al, 2001, Harwood et al, 2005, LaBelle et al, 1980, Li et al, 2015, Savichtcheva and Okabe, 2006, Schets et al, 2008, Sinclair et al, 2012, Stewart et al, 2008, Symonds et al, 2014, Verbyla et al, 2016, Wu et al, 2011, Yates, 2007). This is not surprising given the vastly different physical characteristics of FIB and enteric viruses, which results in disparate responses to treatment and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the last four decades, numerous studies have demonstrated that FIB, one of the most frequently used and easily measured water quality parameters (Ashbolt et al, 2001), do not correlate with or predict the presence of enteric viruses in treated (waste)water, shellfish, environmental waters, and fresh produce (Carducci et al, 2009, Eregno et al, 2018, Fout et al, 2017, Gerba et al, 2017, Griffin et al, 2001, Harwood et al, 2005, LaBelle et al, 1980, Li et al, 2015, Savichtcheva and Okabe, 2006, Schets et al, 2008, Sinclair et al, 2012, Stewart et al, 2008, Symonds et al, 2014, Verbyla et al, 2016, Wu et al, 2011, Yates, 2007). This is not surprising given the vastly different physical characteristics of FIB and enteric viruses, which results in disparate responses to treatment and environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a variety of bacteriophages can be measured with culture-based assays and are therefore affordable enteric virus surrogates to monitor fecal pollution and (waste)water treatment efficiency, these bacteriophages do not consistently correlate with the presence of enteric viruses (Eregno et al, 2018, Fout et al, 2017, Lin and Ganesh, 2013, Santiago-Rodriguez et al, 2013, Savichtcheva and Okabe, 2006). Additionally, a recently identified and abundant crAssphage has been proposed as a viral fecal pollution indicator (Dutilh et al, 2014, Stachler and Bibby, 2014); however, more research is needed to understand its correlation with infectious human enteric viruses in contaminated environments and throughout wastewater treatment before crAssphage can be used as an index or process enteric virus indicator (García-Aljaro et al, 2017, Stachler et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Releasing a complex array of microorganisms into the environment, which include bacteria, viruses, protozoa, etc., could become a serious public health risk. The abundance of pathogenic organisms into the environment will vary depending on the efficiency of the treatment system and the decay rate in the accepted water body (Eregno et al., 2018; Goh et al., 2019). In this study, TC and FC, which are used as microbial indicators, indicate the presence of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies consider kitchen sink effluent to be greywater, while others exclude it. Several studies have found greywater to have lower concentrations of faecal pathogens than blackwater (the water from toilets), making source-separated greywater a promising candidate for wider adoption of on-site water reuse (Jefferson et al 2004;Li et al 2009;Eregno et al 2018). Additionally, greywater represents the largest fraction of household effluent (Larsen et al 2013), making it more available in general for these uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%