2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decarbonizing via disparities: Problematizing the relationship between social identity and solar energy transitions in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies from various countries have identified an urban-rural divide in solar PV deployment, although the direction of this divide varies depending on the study context. For instance, rural municipalities have more solar PV projects per capita in Switzerland [20], while urban counties have more solar installations per capita in Georgia, USA [21]. Recent research has also found that solar deployment occurs in many Republican households, but to a greater extent in Democratic households [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from various countries have identified an urban-rural divide in solar PV deployment, although the direction of this divide varies depending on the study context. For instance, rural municipalities have more solar PV projects per capita in Switzerland [20], while urban counties have more solar installations per capita in Georgia, USA [21]. Recent research has also found that solar deployment occurs in many Republican households, but to a greater extent in Democratic households [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar energy presents particular promise in this regard because photovoltaic solar energy can be (and has been, in many cases) developed in a decentralized fashion at scale to serve a particular location's energy needs, such as on rooftops or in an empty city lot. However, the build‐out of large‐scale, photovoltaic solar facilities, also known as “solar farms” or utility‐scale solar (USS) is rapidly increasing in rural America (Hettel Tidwell and Tidwell 2021; Mulvaney 2017, 2019; Pascaris et al 2021) and—critically for our work—outpacing the development of decentralized (e.g., rooftop or other distributed generation) solar (Davis et al 2022). This pattern is seemingly consistent around other regions of the world (Brock, Sovacool, and Hook 2021; Measham et al 2021; Rignall 2016; Roddis et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that there are many factors driving the solar energy transition, such as incentives, policy, regulations, behavior, and sustainability [10][11][12]. Many parameters affect PV panel performance, such as technology, design, irradiance, dust, humidity, ambient temperatures, and other environmental parameters [13,14]. These cells are affected by many environmental influences, such as shadows, temperature, relative humidity, and dust [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bulk of the solar radiation is absorbed by the cell to increase its temperature, the smaller part goes to generate electricity. High cell temperature causes a decrease in the generated power and a deterioration in the electrical efficiency of the system [13]. The researchers proposed to reduce the negative effects of this thorny issue (since the best fields for creating photovoltaic fields are in deserts with high solar radiation) by using PVT systems [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%