Decarbonizing strategies of the retail sector following the Paris Agreement

Abstract

The retail industry is one of the top 10 most carbon-intensive sectors. This paper is original in addressing what has changed in corporate retail with the Paris Agreement, accessing trends to decarbonize the sector. A qualitative comparison was performed regarding the policy, strategy and energy-related building solutions of the top 27 global retailers, ranked according to their revenue, regarding the reporting periods of 2014-2015 and 2016-2017. For each retailer, data were searched on retailers' sustainability reports was organized in different tables according to the variables policy, strategy and energy-related building practice. A comparison analysis was carried out, in order to identify differentiating decarbonizing measures. Corporate governance is increasingly relevant to manage climate change issues. Strategies to decarbonize the retail sector include establishing ambitious energy goals, invest in sustainability of supply chain with more efficient logistics and in greener retail operations, with buildings designed and managed under a life-cycle perspective (energy-efficiency, renewable energy and natural refrigerants). Retailers are progressively aligning their energy targets to those of the Paris Agreement and converging in business principles and reporting standards. With forthcoming regulation on GHG emissions, retailers could benefit from a business case on lowcarbon opportunities and financial incentives to accelerate low-carbon transition investments.

Exploring institutional competing logic for sustainability implementation of retail chains

“…Unsurprisingly, environmental sustainability seems to be the most prevalent focus in the research papers: logistics-related environmental considerations and environmental performance indicators (Björklund et al. , 2016; Naidoo and Gasparatos, 2018); energy-saving responsibility in retail environments (Richmond and Simpson, 2016; Fereira et al. , 2019) and food waste management practices (Filimonau and Gherbin, 2017).…”

Will the Management Structure of Energy Administrators Affect the Achievement of the Electrical Efficiency Mandatory Target for Taiwan Factories?

“…From the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement, reducing carbon dioxide emissions is of international concern [4][5][6][7]. Accordingly, each country has put forward its nationally determined contribution (NDC), in which its carbon reduction goals are outlined [8][9][10][11].…”

Impacts of Paris agreement, fossil fuel consumption, and net energy imports on CO2 emissions: a panel data approach for three West European countries

“…The Paris agreement on climate change seeks to prevent rising temperature continuously in the world. In other words, this agreement is trying to decline global greenhouse gas emissions to limit the global temperature rise in this century to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, while practicing means to restrict the increase to 1.5 degrees (Ferreira et al, 2019) and(Rose et al, 2017), It is also believed that this agreement is a landmark in a multilateral climate change, because it gathered mostly all nations together for a common goal and to undertake determined efforts to combat climate change (UNFCC, 2015). Furthermore, it is claimed that the environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms is ensured by Paris agreement because of presenting a novel context (Schneider et al, 2019) European countries have been traditionally considered as international leaders on climate change and environmental issues (Oberthür et al, 2017), also as a whole, EU countries are among the biggest energy consumers and are considered the main GHG emitters in the world (Liobikienė et al, 2017).…”