2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-05128-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debris flow susceptibility zonation using statistical models in parts of Northwest Indian Himalayas—implementation, validation, and comparative evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the main basis for risk response and risk control. Due to the accuracy and applicability of different types of combined forecasting models, researchers have carried out many effective practical design and exploration studies and have also achieved many effective results in theoretical methods and practical applications [ 13 ]. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the occurrence of international trade risks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the main basis for risk response and risk control. Due to the accuracy and applicability of different types of combined forecasting models, researchers have carried out many effective practical design and exploration studies and have also achieved many effective results in theoretical methods and practical applications [ 13 ]. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the occurrence of international trade risks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope unit above can better reflect the natural conditions of debris-flow development and has a small area, but numerous small or unreasonable polygons may be generated in the flat area after completing the slope unit division, thereby leading to errors in the susceptibility modeling process (Huang et al 2020b). The grid unit therein has a strong advantage in statistical calculations, that facilitates the data processing by the debris-flow susceptibility model (Dash et al 2022), although its ability to reflect the physical relationship between the hazard factor and the debris-flow is low, by comparing with the above two. Moreover, the grid unit can generate the more authentic and credible assessment results, and realize the smooth transition of the assessment results of the whole study area, so it is widely used in the assessment of geological hazard susceptibility Angillieri et al 2020).…”
Section: Debris-flow Susceptibility Assessment Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Draw landslide susceptibility mapping, and analyze and discuss the performance of each model and the main control disaster factors. 13 Geofluids meaningless workload, which will often have an adverse impact on the evaluation accuracy [58]. There is no fixed reference for the selection of the number of influencing factors.…”
Section: Modeling Process (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of quantitative attribution analysis model accounted for the main research model. Qualitative attribution analysis is highly correlated with researchers with knowledge reserves and subjectivity, resulting in a large difference in their effects [7], such as analytic hierachy process(AHP) and Entropy weight method [8]; other statistical models and the coupling models are also widely applied, such as frequency ratio model [9][10][11], information value model [12,13], and evidence weight model [14][15][16]. However, the results of these models are not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%