2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the remote distance district (>10 km), gender and income both affect WTP decision, such that the government should continue advocating wetland conservation to help the female and low-income people living in relatively remote distance districts internalize appropriate messages and make correct choices. Interestingly, with regard to the WTP amounts of the residents, income is the most important factor, which is in line with the results of Voltaire et al (2013). This finding can be attributed to the fact that when people are asked whether they are willing to pay for wetland restoration, the primary determinant is the knowledge level of the respondents about this subject.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the remote distance district (>10 km), gender and income both affect WTP decision, such that the government should continue advocating wetland conservation to help the female and low-income people living in relatively remote distance districts internalize appropriate messages and make correct choices. Interestingly, with regard to the WTP amounts of the residents, income is the most important factor, which is in line with the results of Voltaire et al (2013). This finding can be attributed to the fact that when people are asked whether they are willing to pay for wetland restoration, the primary determinant is the knowledge level of the respondents about this subject.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A higher the income level indicated a higher is the probability of being certain about WTP, which was consistent with previous studies (Petrolia and Kim, 2011;Voltaire et al, 2013). The impact of resource development had a strong positive impact on respondent uncertainty at 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels in the hypothetical and real settings, respectively.…”
Section: Determinants Of Respondent Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Respondents' effort is found to be positively and significantly related to WTP US Hammitt and Zhou (2006) CVM is used to elicit people's WTP for air pollution health risk reduction. It is also used as an effective method to compare the effect of public and private vehicle mechanism on respondents' WTP China Voltaire et al (2013) This study deals with preference uncertainty in contingent WTP for a nature protection programme. They found that if a respondent is certain about his/her WTP then he/she will pick a single value for WTP otherwise he/she will go for interval values Gulf of Morbihan…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%