DEAHP Approach for Manpower Performance Evaluation

Abstract

The manpower in an organization constitutes an important and essential asset. Competent personnel endowed with individual academic and managerial strengths in specific disciplines and personal capabilities, who can undertake a variety of marketing or research assignments, are needed in any organization as they substantially credit to its performance. Development of rational techniques for capability assessment during recruitment of personnel is therefore vital. The techniques that are normally employed for decision making in identification of performance attributes including their weight assignments include techniques like Delphi and decision matrix, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) etc. AHP converts qualitative opinion of experts into quantified values and generates a decision matrix. In this paper, we have integrated Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to generate local weights of alternatives from pair-wise comparison of judgment matrix used in the AHP for a three attribute system for measuring performance of personnel at entry level of managerial hierarchy. Multiple expert judgments have been considered for weight determination of the attributes. Thus, DEAHP (i.e., combined DEA-AHP approach) has been proposed in this paper as an alternative to the traditional methods of weight derivation in AHP.

Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Pemerintah AHP dan 360-Degree Feedback

“…Hasil dari skala prioritas selanjutnya secara sintesis dilakukan sebagai pertimbangan dalam proses evaluasi atau penilaian [6]. Prinsip dasar metode AHP adalah: (1) penyusunan hirarki; (2) penentuan prioritas; (3) konsistensi logika [7]. AHP mengatur tujuan, atribut-atribut, dan pilihan-pilihan yang diterjemahkan ke dalam bentuk struktur pohon hierarki sebagai gambaran yang kompleks yang saling berhubungan dengan masalah pengambilan keputusan dalam membantu penilai untuk menilai dan membandingkan akurasi kriteria [2].…”

Integrations and Applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process With Data Envelopment Analysis – A Literature Review

“…The other problems studied included facility layout design selection (Yang & Kuo, 2003;Amin & Toloo, 2007;Ertay et al, 2006), government agency location selection and evaluation (Takamura & Tone, 2003), a supplier efficiency and productivity measurement problem that falls under performance evaluation and efficiency measurement (Sinuany-Stern et al, 2000;Zarei et al, 2012;Omid & Zegordi, 2015;Giokas & Pentzaropoulos, 2008), assessment and optimization of personal productivity (Azadeh, 2011), financial performance assessment (Pakkar, 2014), agility-enablers identification and agility measurement that falls under business unit evaluation (Saleeshya & Babu, 2012), bridge risk assessment , emerging logistics performance evaluation and efficiency measurement (Zhang & Fu, 2012), evaluation and selection of business firm unit (Ahmad et al, 2006;Kasap & Kiris, 2013), institutional efficiency measurement that falls under performance evaluation and efficiency measurement (Antonio et al, 2012), service units evaluation as in the case of business unit evaluation (Shirouyehzad & Lofti, 2013), ground water quality evaluation (Kavurmaci & Üstün, 2016), comparison of appropriate decision support of HR practices on organizational performance which falls under process evaluation (Tseng & Lee, 2009), manpower performance evaluation and efficiency measurement (Singh & Aggarwal, 2014), multiplicative aggregation of financial ratios (Pakkar, 2015), port logistics performance as in the case of business unit evaluation (Lozano & Villa, 2009), quantitative risk assessment in multi-modal green logistics (Kengpol & Tuammee, 2015), relative efficiency measurement (Foroughia & Esfahani, 2012), road safety performance (Pakkar, 2016), selection of best alternative for forklifts purchase (Hadad & Hanani, 2011), synthetic financial evaluation (Cai & Wu, 2001) and performance evaluation (Saen et al, 2005;Banwet...…”

Research of AHP/DEA evaluation model for operation performance of municipal wastewater treatment plants

“…It is used to measure the managers of three different systems at the entry level. It is concluded that the "DEAHP" method has proposed the weight derivation method as substitute of the traditional AHP [7]. Combining with the special situations and actual demands of small and medium enterprises, Liu et al…”