2014
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2014.2297994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deadbeat Control Strategy of Circulating Currents in Parallel Connection System of Three-Phase PWM Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being an intelligent controller, the derivatives of control parameters depict the future state of the system and hence the control action. For research purposes, a deadbeat controller benefits the system with error compensation in the inverter current but is also sensitive to the network parameters 62‐64 . In Figure 3, the schematic layout of the deadbeat controller with reference signal r(z) processed through the controller to the designed system with y(z) as the main output where e represents an error signal to the controller unit, Q and P represents the polynomials of the transfer function, u represents the manipulated signal, and P represents the actual system/model. Model Predictive Control (MPC): It minimizes the forecast error while aiming at accurate tracking of the current parameter.…”
Section: Microgrid: Issues and Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being an intelligent controller, the derivatives of control parameters depict the future state of the system and hence the control action. For research purposes, a deadbeat controller benefits the system with error compensation in the inverter current but is also sensitive to the network parameters 62‐64 . In Figure 3, the schematic layout of the deadbeat controller with reference signal r(z) processed through the controller to the designed system with y(z) as the main output where e represents an error signal to the controller unit, Q and P represents the polynomials of the transfer function, u represents the manipulated signal, and P represents the actual system/model. Model Predictive Control (MPC): It minimizes the forecast error while aiming at accurate tracking of the current parameter.…”
Section: Microgrid: Issues and Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trap filter for the output of interleaved converters was studied in [33] and as a result of several considerations on the design for the output filter, a combination of an LCL filter with an LC harmonic trap was proposed in [11]. A methodology for calculating the optimum angles of interleaved converters under PS-PWM with unequal power sharing in order to minimize the grid current distortion was developed in [20] and a deadbeat controller for control of the circulating current was proposed in [34].…”
Section: Current Control In Interleaved Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with: (30) where s k denotes the switching function. Defining y = i xk and z = u xk − v cxk , Equation (29) can then be expressed as:…”
Section: Online Parameter Estimator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved modulation techniques are commonly-used active methods [28]. The voltage zero vector of space-vector-pulse-width modulation (SVPWM) is used in each paralleled module to suppress the circulating current [29,30]. However, the control performance deteriorates when the system parameters are different in each converter module.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%