2020
DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dead end and Detour: The function of the RNA-binding protein Dnd in posttranscriptional regulation in the germline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…differentiate towards other lineages and are not lost by apoptosis is supported by the observation that aggregate size and total cell numbers are increased in TS KO aggregates compared to the WT counterpart. This is in agreement with studies in zebrafish and mouse showing that DND is not needed for PGC specification, but is of upmost importance for maintenance and further development of the germline [1,4,6]. Our current results may also be explained by differentiation of iMeLCs to other cell types showing stronger mitotic expansion.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…differentiate towards other lineages and are not lost by apoptosis is supported by the observation that aggregate size and total cell numbers are increased in TS KO aggregates compared to the WT counterpart. This is in agreement with studies in zebrafish and mouse showing that DND is not needed for PGC specification, but is of upmost importance for maintenance and further development of the germline [1,4,6]. Our current results may also be explained by differentiation of iMeLCs to other cell types showing stronger mitotic expansion.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The DND microRNA-mediated repression inhibitor 1 (DND1) is the human homolog of dead end (dnd), a conserved RNA binding protein (RBP) that plays an important role in survival and maintenance of primordial germ cells (PGCs) and the development of the male germline [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that the soluble versus condensed states of these complexes are specifically required in distinct developmental and physiological contexts strongly suggests that the transition betwe en these states is subjected to tight cellular regulation (Banani et al, 2017; Boeynaems et al, 2018; Dodson & Kennedy, 2020; Folkmann et al, 2021; Hyman et al, 2014). For example, RNA binding proteins often contain IDRs adjacent to their RNA binding domains, such that initial RNA binding increases the IDR concentrations over the required threshold for their interactions to trigger phase separation (Folkmann et al, 2021; Gross-Thebing & Raz, 2020; Guo & Shorter, 2015; Luo et al, 2018). RNA binding in such cases can be regulated to control the rate and extent of phase separation of their corresponding RNP granule (Folkmann et al, 2021; Gross-Thebing & Raz, 2020; Guo & Shorter, 2015; Luo et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, RNA binding proteins often contain IDRs adjacent to their RNA binding domains, such that initial RNA binding increases the IDR concentrations over the required threshold for their interactions to trigger phase separation (Folkmann et al, 2021; Gross-Thebing & Raz, 2020; Guo & Shorter, 2015; Luo et al, 2018). RNA binding in such cases can be regulated to control the rate and extent of phase separation of their corresponding RNP granule (Folkmann et al, 2021; Gross-Thebing & Raz, 2020; Guo & Shorter, 2015; Luo et al, 2018). Recent work has revealed that RNA can also promote phase separation independently of IDRs (see chapter 1.1.1 .)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%