Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deactivation of a Au/CeO2–Co3O4 catalyst during CO preferential oxidation in H2-rich stream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the studied supports, usually metal oxides, there are reports about the use of MnOx [44], Fe2O3 [45], and Co2O3 [46], among others. Their intrinsic ability for the CO oxidation is due to some oxygen species that are especially activated through electronic transfer between them and the metallic cations, allowing a successful activation of the CO and O2 molecules for CO2 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the studied supports, usually metal oxides, there are reports about the use of MnOx [44], Fe2O3 [45], and Co2O3 [46], among others. Their intrinsic ability for the CO oxidation is due to some oxygen species that are especially activated through electronic transfer between them and the metallic cations, allowing a successful activation of the CO and O2 molecules for CO2 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, three (α, β and γ) peaks can be observed. Peaks of α and β are attributed to the reduction of the CuO species, α peak corresponds to the reduction of highly dispersed CuO particles which have strong interaction with CeO 2 -Co 3 O 4 composite oxides, while β peak corresponds to bulk CuO and partial CeO 2 [10][11][12] . And γ peak can be assigned to the reduction of supports.…”
Section: Content Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noble metal catalysts (such as Pt, Au, etc.) have been found the most effectual for CO-PROX [8][9][10][11] . Nevertheless, the poor selectivity and high cost greatly limit their applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalysts for CO PROX are mainly the precious metals catalysts (such as Pt, Ru and Rh), gold-based catalysts and CuO-based catalysts 1,5 . Of these catalysts, catalysts based on combinations between copper and cerium oxides have also shown promising properties for CO PROX and constitute a more interesting alternative from an economical point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these catalysts, catalysts based on combinations between copper and cerium oxides have also shown promising properties for CO PROX and constitute a more interesting alternative from an economical point of view. Extensive investigations have been carried out about the preparation methods, characterization, mechanism and testing of CuO/CeO 2 catalysts [3][4][5][6][7][8] . Some researchers reported the performance of CuO/CeO 2 catalysts was superior to that of Pt-based catalysts because of strong interactions between the copper species and the CeO 2 support 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%