2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-005-1327-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEA and Dynamic Yardstick Competition in Scandinavian Electricity Distribution

Abstract: Multi-period multi-product regulatory schemes for electricity distributors are presented, based on cost information from a productivity analysis model and an agency theoretical decision model. The proposed schemes are operational and demonstrate considerable advantages compared to the popular CPI-X revenue cap regulation. The schemes avoid arbitrariness, excessively high or negative informational rents as well as ratchet effects and they promote rapid productivity catch-up by making full use of available data.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
44
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Agrell et al (2005), the Norwegian regulation is considered to be one of the most advanced schemes. The annual revenue caps are determined based on the comparison of actual cost with a cost norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Agrell et al (2005), the Norwegian regulation is considered to be one of the most advanced schemes. The annual revenue caps are determined based on the comparison of actual cost with a cost norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we assume to have a common underlying cost function of the form x(Y ) = y 2 , truth-telling and no inefficiency in production (i.e. i = 1 ∀ i) for all bidders, would imply that the principal picks a quality-price-bid where the quality level is between 3 and 8 (recall that y ∈ U [1,10]). Obviously more extreme quality levels can be selected when we allow for individual inefficiencies in production.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Simulation Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied yardstick principle is known from the regulation of natural monopolies (see e.g. [1]) and [8] has previously suggested yardstick competition as an integrated part of multi-attribute auctions. However, as [8] point out, straightforward use of yardstick competition introduces sophisticated strategic manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thakur et al (2006), for example, reporting on a study of the Indian electricity distribution sector, found evidence that part of its inefficiency is due to the large size of the distribution companies, suggesting that restructuring and downsizing the operations may help utilities to improve their performance. Arocena (2008) Other countries where DEA has been used to evaluate the efficiency of distribution utilities include Norway (Førsund and Kittelsen, 1998;Agrell et al, 2005), Philippines (Pacudan and de Guzman, 2002), Finland (Korhonen and Syrjänen, 2003), Chile (Sanhueza et al, 2004), Colombia (Pombo and Taborda, 2006), Iran (Azadeh et al, 2009a,b), Ukraine (Berg et al, 2005) and Portugal (Weyman-Jones et al, 2004, 2008. It is important to emphasise, however, that whilst some studies exist exploring the use of DEA for the evaluation of electricity distribution utilities in Portugal, they are very rare.…”
Section: Single-country Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%