2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Need Higher Doses of Advagraf Compared With Prograf to Get Therapeutic Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with other observational studies. [4][5][6] It seems that a higher dosage of tacrolimus is required to achieve the same tacrolimus level as baseline. However, in stable transplant recipients, as the tacrolimus target trough levels are kept between 4 and 6 ng/mL, dosage modifications are usually not necessary or are minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are consistent with other observational studies. [4][5][6] It seems that a higher dosage of tacrolimus is required to achieve the same tacrolimus level as baseline. However, in stable transplant recipients, as the tacrolimus target trough levels are kept between 4 and 6 ng/mL, dosage modifications are usually not necessary or are minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Trials are summarized in Table 4. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] We were one of the first transplant centers in Canada to switch twice-daily to OD ER tacrolimus in stable kidney transplants who had been followed-up for 2 years. Despite the observational nature of our study and the absence of a control group, we demonstrated that conversion to ER tacrolimus was safe and convenient in one-third of kidney transplant recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most previous pharmacokinetics studies comparing twice-daily and once-daily tacrolimus in de novo transplant recipients have reported that, after once-daily tacrolimus administration, C min values are reduced in the immediate posttransplant period and higher doses of the drug are required to maintain target concentrations. 9,24,25 A previous multicenter comparison of the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus administered once-versus twice-daily to de novo LDLT recipients also demonstrated lower C min values and a higher dose requirement for once daily tacrolimus than for twice-daily tacrolimus when normalized to mr doses of tacrolimus (unpublished data). Here, a higher dose of once-daily tacrolimus was required to maintain target concentrations during the posttransplant period, especially immediately after the conversion from intravenous to oral administration of the drug.…”
Section: Figure 1 Liver Transplantation At Başkent Universitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…21 The efficacy and safety data from 14 additional observational studies are consistent with the randomized controlled trial data (Table 1). [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Although the effect of TAC QD versus TAC BID on adherence in de novo transplantation has not been systematically tested, an industry-sponsored modeling analysis that extrapolated the effect on adherence, as well as outcomes from a literature review of other studies of twiceversus once-daily medication, suggested that, after 5 years, graft survival would be 6.1% higher in the TAC QD group, which would result in a cost saving of US $9,411 per patient over the 5 years. 33 TAC QD is a useful treatment option that may reduce pill burden in patients adapting to life after transplantation, but an advantage in terms of efficacy or safety has not been demonstrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%