De-Historicizing (Mainstream) Ottoman Historiography on Tanzimat and Tahdith: Jus Gentium and Pax Britannica Violate Osmanli Sovereignty in Arabia

Abstract

The (secular-humanist) philosophical theology governing (positivist) disciplines such as International Law and International Relations precludes a priori any communicative examination of how the exclusion of Arab-Ottoman jurisprudence is necessary for the ontological coherence of jurisprudent concepts such as society and sovereignty, together with teleological narratives constellating the “Age of Reason” such as modernity and civilization. The exercise of sovereignty by the British Crown—in 19th and 20th century Arabia—consisted of (positivist) legal doctrines comprising “scientific processes” denying Ottoman legal sovereignty, thereby proceeding to “order” societies situated in Dar al-Islam and “detach” Ottoman-Arab subjects from their Ummah. This “rational exercise” of power by the British Crown—mythologizing an unbridgeable epistemological gap between a Latin-European subject as civic and an objectified Ottoman-Arab as despotic—legalized (regulatory) measures referencing ethno/sect-centric paradigms which not only “deported” Ottoman-Arab ijtihad (Eng. legal reasoning and exegetic hermeneutics) from the realm of “international law”, but also rationalized geographic demarcations and demographic alterations across Ottoman-Arab vilayets. Both inter-related disciplines, therefore, affirm an “exclusionary self-image” when dealing with “foreign epistemologies” by transforming “cultural difference” into “legal difference”, thus suing that it is in the protection of jus gentium that “recognized sovereigns” exercise redeeming measures on “Turks”, “Moors”, or “Arabs”. It is precisely the knowledge lost ensuing from such irreflexive “positivist image” that this legal-historical research seeks to deconstruct by moving beyond a myopic analysis claiming Ottoman-Arab ‘Umran (Eng. civilization) as homme malade (i.e., sick man); or that the Caliphate attempted but failed to become reasonable during the 18th and 19th century because it adhered to Arab-Islamic philosophical theology. Therefore, this research commits to deconstructing “mainstream” Ottoman historiography claiming that tanzimat (Eng. reorganization) and tahdith (Eng. modernization) were simply “degenerative periods” affirming the temporal “backwardness” of Ottoman civilization and/or the innate incapacity of its epistemology in furnishing a (modern) civil society.

Dumpster Diving Threat in Personal Data Leakage Case in Indonesia

“…The good intention to suppress the amount of waste led to protests by citizens who saw that their privacy rights had been violated. Citizens perceive that none is allowed to see the contents of their waste, not to mention assess and count the amount of waste (Al-Kassimi, 2021). It shows different interpretations of waste between citizens and the government, especially regarding privacy rights.…”

Indigenous Peoples and International Law in the Ecuadorian Amazon

“…Some isolated communities were able to practice the art of not being governed (Scott 2009), and a few small groups have been able to keep themselves isolated through into the twenty-first century. Generally, however, after the independence of the Spanish colonies in the early nineteenth century, conditions worsened when previously marginalized communities and those still attempting to live in voluntary isolation were gradually incorporated as citizens (Wearne 1996), a process that withdrew land rights at the same time as drawing them into the jurisdiction of a modernizing state within a positivist teleological worldview of bounded sovereign nations that was alien to them (Al Kassimi 2021).…”

“…Once it had been established by the Catholic juridical theorists that Amerindians were to be considered humans capable of rational thought, international law, which they did not play a part in constructing, could be applied to them, regardless of their beliefs and customs. At the same time, while designated as human, Amerindians had to be portrayed by Europeans as being different and inferior, first as pagans to be converted to Christianity and later as pre-modern barbarians to be "civilized" (Al Kassimi 2021). The concept of modernity itself is predicated upon colonization.…”