(De)constructing the Masculine Blueprint: The Institutional and Discursive Consequences of Male Political Dominance

Abstract

Men are overrepresented in most legislatures of the world. However, in parliaments in which women reach a “critical mass” or even approach parity with men in terms of numbers, they still must contend with and adapt to the symbolic representation of men. Using the cases of the Australian and Polish parliaments, we point to the need to deconstruct the parliamentary standard by shifting the theoretical and empirical focus from women's disadvantage in politics to problematizing men's advantage and power (Eveline 1994, 1998; Murray 2014). Rather than placing the problem and solution with women, we address the practices that maintain men's unearned power, or privilege. Privilege is the “systematically conferred advantages” that individuals enjoy by virtue of their membership of a dominant social group (Bailey 1998, 109). Institutions in the form of taken-for-granted practices and gendered discourses embed a “masculine blueprint” in political institutions that legitimizes men's place as parliamentarians and privileges men, enhancing their power and advantage in the election process. By focusing on men's dominance, it becomes evident that sustaining gender inequality through practices and discourse advantages men as a group.

Appraisal of male privilege: On the dual role of identity threat and shame in response to confrontations with male privilege

“…Gender inequality and sexism are often framed in terms of disadvantages for women. However, feminist scholars point out the importance of also acknowledging and dismantling male privileges to overcome sexism, patriarchal arrangements, and masculinist standards (Galea & Gaweda, 2018;Pease, 2010). Past research has shown, for example, that becoming aware of one's group-based privileges and perceiving them to be unjust is a central component in motivating political allyship against systems of inequality (Droogendyk et al, 2016;.…”

Appraisal of male privilege: On the dual role of identity threat and shame in response to confrontations with male privilege

“…Gender inequality and sexism are often framed in terms of disadvantages for women. However, feminist scholars point out the importance of also acknowledging and dismantling male privileges to overcome sexism, patriarchal arrangements, and masculinist standards (Galea & Gaweda, 2018;Pease, 2010). Past research has shown, for example, that becoming aware of one's group-based privileges and perceiving them to be unjust is a central component in motivating political allyship against systems of inequality (Droogendyk et al, 2016;.…”

Organizational Roots of Gender Polarization in the State Legislature

“…This paper deconstructs the partisan practices comprising the “masculine blueprint” (Galea and Gaweda 2018) of state legislatures that legitimizes the dominance of men in state legislatures. In so doing, this paper contributes to scholarship challenging the assumption that legislatures become less gendered as more women enter them (Funk et al.…”